Proof

by Krage Ruckuss

The <b>concepts</b> of Woman, God and Universe all exist in the same realm. More importantly, if all three exist in <b>objective reality</b> then, all three exist in separate realms. Using the 5 basic human senses or even 6 to prove the existence of Woman does not suffice to prove the existence of God anymore than it does the Universe without Her. Or does it?

If we are going to prove the existence of the <b>external</b> using our five senses, and this methodology manifests it's proof as the <b>internal</b> experience. Then surely we need to also prove this 'internal experience' to check that our 'senses sensor' is indeed as valid as that which it is sensing. Already we are confounded because the thing we are sensing is in a different realm to the thing, which is sensing it and the thing sensing the sensing. But let's assume this isn't a problem for now. Let's call our 'senses sensor' our 'logic tool'. These things we sense either exist externally or they do not. Our 'logic tool' and 'internal experience of the external' are one and the same. Now we can't use our 'logic tool' and it's methodology for proving the existence of the internal experience as it is inextricably a part of the thing it is now attempting to validate. So we will conjure a sixth sense, one that senses the 'internal' domain. Let's call this sixth sense 'intuition'. The internal experience has itself become a sixth sense. The internal experience of the internal experience. Let's call our 'internal experience sensor' our 'intuition tool'.

Now let's assume that our 'intuition tool' does in fact validate our 'logic tool'. Here we are further hindered by our need for yet another more fundamental tool, and we risk descending into an ad-infinitum argument. Though here we can argue that because the 'intuition tool' and it's methodology are already imbued with 'magical' power through a conjuring of their own design then, we can make them foundational in essence, in that they can prove their own validity without running into irreconcilable paradox.

However, we still have the problem of using one methodology (intuition {remember logic is already resting on this [besides it is in the same realm]}) to validate things in two separate realms i.e. the [b/]external/objective other</b> and the <b>internal/subjective being</b>.

We are forced to choose only one or the other as having been proven to exist. Given this choice I am going to choose the one, which resides in the same domain as the very methodology which has proven it.

Having now proven the existence of my subjective experience, taking a 'leap of faith' along the way, I am going to take one last giant leap. I am going to give my 'intuition tool' yet more power and allow it to validate existence in both realms. Hey presto I again have the ability to determine the existence of the 'external'.

Now I can get down to the serious work of science. Attempting to become God or discovering She exists in Her own right, whichever comes first.