About
Community
Bad Ideas
Drugs
Ego
Erotica
Fringe
Society
Religion
"Bob" and the Church of the Subgenius
Christianity
Discordians - Principia Discordia
Eastern Religions and Philosophies
Islam
Judaism
Miscellaneous Religious and Philosophical Texts
New Age Beliefs
Other Western Religions
Pagans and Wiccans
Satanists
The Occult
Technology
register | bbs | search | rss | faq | about
meet up | add to del.icio.us | digg it

A commentary on Black Theology (he means _libera


THE TRUTH ABOUT BLACK LIBERAL THEOLOGY
by Dr. Robert A. Morey

All racist theologies have the same basic core ideas and methodology. Thus it
does not really matter if we are talking about the KKK, the Nation of Islam or
Black liberal theology, their focus is always on skin and not sin; race and not
grace; gossip and not gospel. Racism is always focused on the outward instead
of the inward because it cannot deal with the root problem of sin. Hatred and
violence feed on bitterness and racist rage. Class envy does not help anyone in
this life or in the next. Blaming others for one's own sin and guilt will not
solve the problem. We must take responsibility for what we do in life instead
of blaming "the man" for our failures and woe. This is why we need to break
the shackle of black liberal theology which enslave the black man and keeps
him poor and angry. May God use this study to liberate black men and women from
the lie of black liberal theology.

I am aware that while the vast majority of Black Liberal Theologians are
clearly guilty of believing in white liberalism and Neo-Marxist liberation
theology, there are a few "conservative" writers who have fallen for some of
their lies. Thus they will complain that not everything stated in this article
applies to them. But as with any other movement, we must deal with the majority
view and not with those few who are out of step with that majority.

I. The "Roots" of Black Liberal Theology.

"Black liberal theology" (from now on shortened to the initials "BT")
is another name for Western Liberation Theology which was created by white,
middle-class, European, Marxist, liberal theologians to foster social change
by manipulating the lower classes to violent revolution against democratic
governments in order to establish a communist state. Thus BT did not originate
in Africa but in Europe.
The fundamental ideas of BT did not come from black thinkers but from such
white European thinkers as Hegel, Darwin, Marx, etc. It is Euro-centric in its
ideology although it is Euro-phobic in its rhetoric. Black liberal theologians
are in reality "Uncle Toms" still licking the boots of their white, Marxist
masters at such bastions of white liberalism as Princeton, Yale, Harvard, etc..
They are the slaves of Karl Marx.

II. The Goals Of Black Liberal Theology

The goals of BT are to turn religion into sociology, Christianity into a
political agenda, Jesus into a black Marxist rebel, and the gospel into violent
revolution. They are more interested in politics than preaching the gospel.

III. The Methodology of Black Liberal Theology

The main method employed by BT is to manipulate embittered young blacks by
turning their feelings of inferiority, alienation, jealousy, hopelessness and
self-hate, into racist rage against whites, Orientals and affluent blacks who
are conveniently blamed for their lack of personal initiative to better their
lot in life.

IV. The Main Philosophic Error of Black Liberal Theology

BT is based upon the philosophic error of relativism in which "Jesus" is
viewed as only a religious symbol which can be interpreted anyway they want.
Thus it does not matter who and what the historical Jesus really was. BT
invented a black Marxist Jesus to lead the way to violent revolution because
such a "Jesus" will serve their purpose. BT is condemned in II Cor. 11:4 and
Gal. 1:8-9.

V. The Racism Of Black Liberal Theology

While BT is filled with racist statements against whites and Orientals, it is
primarily a form of "black on black" racism. The following evidence demonstrates
this to be true.

A. While BT claims to give blacks a better self-image, they unwittingly
encourage a poor self-image among blacks by defining "blackness" in such
negative terms as "the poor," "the oppressed," and "niggers." Why do they
always define the "black experience" in such negative terms? Why do they
assume that all blacks live in the ghetto subsisting on welfare in the
midst of crime and filth?

B. With its constant emphasis on God loves the poor, the oppressed, etc.
BT actually paralyzes and demoralizes blacks to accept a parasitic life-
style dependent on the government dole instead of fostering self-reliance
and entrepreneurship.

C. It seems to me that BT feeds off of class envy and racist rage. Instead of
spending their time blaming the white man for the black man's problems, BT
ought to be encouraging black men or women to become financially successful
through hard work and self-reliance.

D. BT often describes the black man as a helpless victim of forces and people
beyond his control. But this negative stereotype often leads people to
accept poverty, drugs, crime and filth as their unalterable fate.

E. BT makes a great mistake when it assumes that poverty automatically means
crime and filth. Just because you are poor does not mean you have a
license to rob, rape, or murder others. The poor are for the most part
good and honest people. Crime is crime regardless of who commits it.
Poverty is no excuse for criminality.

F. BT judges people on the basis of the color of their skin instead of the
content of their character.

G. BT gives the impression that the black man's problem is his skin instead
of his sin.

H. Most BT books glorify rage, hatred and violence instead of faith, hope and
love.

I. BT preaches race instead of grace as the solution to problems.

J. BT cries out for political liberation instead of spiritual salvation.

K. BT thinks more of Marx than it does of Jesus.

L. BT is more interested in black culture than in Jesus Christ.

VI. The Liberalism Of Black Liberal Theology

BT is not a fundamental, Bible-believing, Christ-honoring theology. BT was
created by white liberation theologians at white liberal seminaries and
universities that are radically anti-Christian and anti-Bible.

A. Most of those involved in BT do not believe in the Trinity, the deity of
Christ, His virgin birth, sinless life, vicarious death, bodily resurrection,
literal ascension or return to this world. They claim that all such doctrines
are "Western."

B. Many of those who teach BT openly deny the immortality of the soul, a
conscious after-life in heaven or hell, the resurrection of the dead, the Last
Judgment and the eternal conscious torment of the damned in hell. They usually
say that hell is "being black on welfare in the ghetto." They attack those
blacks who talk about heaven as a "pie in the sky by and by slave mentality."

C. BT often denounces Christianity as racist and the "white man's religion."
But then it turns around and claims that Jesus was black. If Jesus was a black
man, then how can Christianity be the "white man's religion?"

D. Most BT writers deny the inspiration, inerrancy and authority of the Bible
while at the same time using it to foster their racist agenda.

E. Many BT leaders teach the theory of evolution in which man evolved from an
ape in Africa as if that theory can give dignity to blacks or to anyone else.
The theory of evolution actually destroys all dignity and morals by reducing
man to an animal.

VII. The Absurdity of Black Liberal Theology

BT is so filled with self-contradiction and erroneous ideas that it is has no
intellectual merit. For example, BT defines "blackness" and "whiteness" in the
Marxist sense of class struggle. Thus BT is not really talking about blackness
as a race but as a class. WAKE UP! Read that last sentence again. Did you get
it? Black liberal theology is really concerned with class struggle and not
about black people per se. What is "black" and "white" according to the BT
books?

Black = anyone regardless of race or color who is economically and
politically oppressed by the upper classes.

White = anyone regardless of race or color who is guilty of oppressing
the lower classes.

Walter McCray in his book, The Black Presence In The Bible, quotes with
approval the definition of blackness given by his liberal mentor, Charles
Copher.

Additionally, one may be defined as black regardless of color or race;
all who suffer oppression...are classified as black.(p. 161, n.72.)

This irrational definition ends up with some white people being "black" and
some black people being "white." According to BT's definition, a blond, blue-
eyed, white Swede on drugs and welfare is "black" while the successful black
man who owns his own company is "white." Other absurdities abound in their
writings.

A. BT claims that Adam and Eve were black. If this is true, then all men
are "black" because they came from the first black parents. On what grounds
then does BT divide up mankind into black vs white and black vs yellow?
Aren't we all "black" having come from the same original black DNA?

B. BT claims that Noah, his wife and their three sons and wives were all
blacks. Yet, they also claim that the blacks descended from Ham. And they
run through the Bible looking for Hamite references to track the history
of the black race. How can this obvious contradiction be resolved ?

C. As part of its Marxist ideology, BT believes that history is as relative
as morals. Thus BT rewrites history to foster its own socio-political goals.
This is why BT does not hesitate to teach lies and to practice academic
chicanery. The "truth" is not their concern. To manipulate young blacks
into racist rage is always their real goal.

D. BT claims that nearly every individual and nation mentioned in the Bible
was black. They do not prove that this true. They simply asset that this is
so. Anyone who disagrees with them is labeled a racist.

E. BT claims that the ancient Sumerians, Assyrians, Babylonians and Persians
were all black. Yet, they were the cruelest oppressors known in history.
For example, the Assyrians enslaved and deported entire populations. Mass
murder was their favorite means of oppression. How can they be "black"
when they were worse oppressors than Hitler or Stalin?

F. BT claims that the ancient Egyptians were black and that the Jews were
black as well. But since the Egyptians were a very oppressive society which
enslaved the Jews and other minorities and conquered many surrounding
nations, how can the Egyptians be "black" and oppress people at the same
time?

G. BT just like the KKK and other racist groups claims that its race is the
sole source of all that is good in all cultures. But this is a two edged
sword. If the blacks are responsible for all the good in the world, then
they are equally responsible for all the evil. To claim that the black
man can do no wrong and that the white man and yellow man can do no good,
is absurd as well as racist.

H. BT claims that the ancient Greeks were black and thus Greek philosophy was
created by blacks. But then BT also says that the white Greeks stole their
philosophy from African blacks. How can the Greeks be black and white at
the same time? But if they were all blacks, then what is wrong with blacks
sharing ideas?

I. BT claims that the Greeks stole their ideas from black Africans and thus
all the good in Western culture comes from blacks. But if this is true,
how can BT condemn Western culture on one hand and then claim that it came
from blacks on the other hand?

J. BT also claims that all the good in Oriental culture came from African
blacks. The Orientals thus stole their culture from the blacks. But if this
is true, why are African motifs missing in Oriental philosophies and art?

K. BT authors claim that the Egyptian word Kemet means "the land of the
Blacks." In reality, the word actually means "the black land" referring to
the dark soil along the flood plain of the Nile. It is used in Egyptian
literature in opposition to the word Deshret which literally means "the red
land," a reference to the color of the dirt or sand in the desert.

VIII. Black Liberal Theology Contradicts The Bible

In order to make everyone in the Bible black, BT takes passages out of context,
ignores the grammar of Hebrew and Greek, and then attacks anyone who disagrees
with them as "racist" or "white." But BT violates several clear Scriptures.

1. Acts 17:26 "He made from one all the nations of mankind
to live on all the face of the earth."

The Bible teaches that there is only one race --the human race-- regardless
of size, shape or color. Thus there is no "black" or "white" blood. There is
only human blood which can be transfused from one man to the next regardless
of color or race. BT con-tradicts this by talking about "black blood."

2. Rom. 2:11 "There is no partiality with God."

God does not treat people any differently because they are red, yellow, black
or white. They are all precious in His sight. But BT claims that God is partial
to blacks! This is just as wrong as the Nazis who claimed the same thing for
the Ayrian race or the KKK who claims the same for the white race.

3. Gal. 3:28 "There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is
neither slave nor free man, there is neither male nor
female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus."

BT divides the Church into different economic classes and pits them against
each other. Thus they try to put asunder what God has joined together. The
Body of Christ is one.

4. Eph. 4:4-5:2 "Let all bitterness and wrath and anger
and clamor and slander be put away from you, along with
all malice. And be kind to one another, tender-hearted,
forgiving each other, just as God in Christ also has
forgiven you. Therefore be imitators of God, as beloved
children; and walk in love, just as Christ also loved you,
and gave Himself up for us, an offering and a sacrifice to
God as a fragrant aroma."

BT preaches bitterness, wrath, anger, clamor, slander and that blacks should
seek revenge instead of taking the path of forgiveness.

5. 1 Sam 16:7 "But the LORD said to Samuel, "Do not look at
his appearance or at the height of his stature, because I have
rejected him; for God sees not as man sees, for man looks at
the outward appearance, but the LORD looks at the heart."

BT looks only at the outward appearance. This is wrong. We must judge people
not by their color but by their moral character or lack of it.

Conclusion

Black liberal theology is not of God but of the devil. It is nothing more
than "white liberal religion" and is used by white theologians and politicians
to keep blacks down in order to use them as cannon fodder for a Marxist
revolution. Black liberal theologians slave for their white Marxist masters to
bring about a violent revolution that would guarantee that all men, blacks
included, would always be poor and oppressed.
The only answer to liberal theology, regardless of the color of those who
teach it, is personal salvation through the Lord Jesus Christ. Once you have
experienced the love of God in Christ, you do not have any room in you heart
for the self-hate and racist rage upon which BT feeds.
The black community needs a revival-- not a revolution; Jesus--not Marx;
Christianity --not liberalism. Jesus is the only One who can change the hearts
of all men and set them free from their bondage to sin.

Copyright 1994 Research & Education Foundation (REF)
 
To the best of our knowledge, the text on this page may be freely reproduced and distributed.
If you have any questions about this, please check out our Copyright Policy.

 

totse.com certificate signatures
 
 
About | Advertise | Bad Ideas | Community | Contact Us | Copyright Policy | Drugs | Ego | Erotica
FAQ | Fringe | Link to totse.com | Search | Society | Submissions | Technology
Hot Topics
What's the point in this?
Holy War! Take your pick...
Religion: Unite or Divide?
Atheist assholes
The Only Truth
People who go to hell
The Sadhu
Scientific explanation for demonic possession
 
Sponsored Links
 
Ads presented by the
AdBrite Ad Network

 

TSHIRT HELL T-SHIRTS