What Good is Free Speech if No One Listens?
by Kurt Luedtke
I was for 15 years a journalist, a vocation in which you'd think
you would learn a lot. I learned three things: The accused you've
never met is more guilty than the one you've talked to. Truth and
accuracy are not the same. Things are never, ever, as they appear to
be.
Because I am less and less convinced of where the truth lies and
more and more dubious of our ability to find it, I would like to point
out a particular kind of responsibility -- a personal responsibility --
that I think is in danger of being unmet.
For better and often for worse, this is a pluralistic and
democratic society. It is relatively new and still experimental; it
is probably only three or four generations ago that the country was
effectively governed by an oligarchy that protected us from the
tyranny of the majority. As we come closer and closer to true
democracy, we are ever more susceptible to a certain kind of mob rule
in which popularity substitutes for principle and consensus is
mistaken for wisdom.
It is, I suppose, inevitable that we must pay a price for our
exaltation of the common man; if, for instance, we measure democracy's
viability by what the citizens choose to watch on television, I think
we're entitled to question how in the world this electorate is
entitled to be in charge of anything.
But we have no better idea. We can only hope that the rule of law
and our willingness to abide by it will protect against the worst of
which we are collectively capable.
It is the law in this country, as in no other, that the individual
has an extraordinary right to personal expression. The First
Amendment to the Constitution protects the right to speak and to
publish; these rights and the degree to which they are safeguarded are
the distinguishing characteristics of American society.
For that we have only the courts to thank. Americans seem to be
almost completely uninterested in any point of view other than their
individual own. We are absolutely up to our necks in groups and blocs
and religious and economic interests certain beyond all reason that
they are correct and actively interested in imposing their rules and
values and self-selected morals on the rest of us. They prattle about
democracy, and use it when it suits them without the slightest regard
or respect for what it means and costs and requires. These people are
-- please believe me -- dangerous.
The right to speak is meaningless if no one will listen, and the
right to publish is not worth having if no one will read. It is
simply not enough that we reject censorship and will not countenance
suppression; we have an affirmative responsibility to hear the
argument before we disagree with it.
I think that you think that you agree with me, that you are fair
and open-minded and good citizens. But if we put it to the test -- if
I make up some speeches about gun control, abortion, gay rights,
racial and ethnic characteristics, political terrorism and genocide --
I believe that I can make you boo and jeer or at least walk out in
protest.
We cannot operate that way. It's not difficult to listen to the
philosophy you agree with or don't care about. It's the one that
galls that must be heard. No idea is so repugnant that it must not be
advocated. If we are not free to speak heresy and utter awful
thoughts, we are not free at all. And if we are unwilling to hear
that with which we most violently disagree, we are no longer citizens
but have become part of the mob.
Nowhere is the willingness to listen more important than at a
university, and nowhere is our failure more apparent than at the
university whose faculty members or students think that it's
legitimate to parade their own moral or political purity by shouting
down the unpopular view of the day.
It will not be a week, and certainly not a month, before you will
become aware that someone in your own circle of influence is saying
something or thinking something very wrong. I think you have to do
something about that. I think you have to help them be heard. I
think you are required to listen.
Kurt Luedtke, formerly an editor at the Detroit Free Press, won an
Academy Award for his screenplay for "Out of Africa." His commentary
is excerpted from his speech in acceptance of the William Rogers
alumni award at Brown University last fall.
|