|
The North Carolina Report on the Montana Seige of the Freemen
by Peter Kay
MONTANA SIEGE
Submitted By :
Peter Kay., Stern / Chief Justice & Foreman of the Grand Jury
our one Supreme Court, Common Law Venue
General Jurisdiction
Macon county, North Carolina state.
"It is our belief that the FBI has never intended a peaceful settlement,
is lying to the public about their intentions and intends to destroy the
farm, its inhabitants, and all of the evidence contained therein, no
later than June."
Report;
A team of officers of Our One Supreme Court, Common Law Venue, of Macon
county, North Carolina state, and members of the Press, have concluded a
fact finding mission to Montana State.
The primary goal was to act as intermediaries and facilitators in
creating a set of circumstances whereby the political prisoners (known
as "Freemen") held hostage by the FBI in Brusett, Montana, would not be
subjected to ongoing government-sponsored terrorism.
Another goal diligently sought was to ward off what appeared to be an
impending repeat of the WACO murders and burning of innocent American
citizens under the sham of Law Enforcement.
The dedicated group went in good faith, and with open minds. They were
hoping for forthright, truthful, and productive meetings with FBI agents
and the People on the Farm in Brusett. The Common Law Court Officers
were led by the FBI to believe that a peaceful solution could be
brought about through a non-partisan third party action as an
alternative to Force, and what the FBI supposedly wanted.
They met with FBI agent Tom Canady (leader of the Investigation and
siege at Brusett), and his associate for nearly two hours. Initially,
the meeting seemed to be a frank, open, and a friendly exchange, with
thoughts and ideas presented by both sides. However, after a lengthy
discussion in which the FBI was probing for information(and the Common
Law Court Officers were offering assistance), it became apparent that
something was amiss-that perhaps the FBI was not being entirely candid
and was not acting in reciprocal "good faith".
This became apparent after some direct and pointed questions to the FBI.
Agent Canady stated that it was indeed he who had personally requested a
court order from a judge in order to move the press back from the ranch
"for safety reasons." When pressed for information as to who posed the
threat to the media, the Freemen or the FBI, Agent Canady's demeanor
visibly changed. He became defensive and stated that the siege area
was "locked down for an indeterminate cooling off period, and that no
new people were going to be brought in or allowed to talk with the
hostages, and the FBI wasn't going to do anything else confrontational."
Canady said that the Common Law Court Officers "could sit around as long
as they liked, but would not be allowed on the site at any time in the
foreseeable future." The Officers volunteered assistance as could
better inform the FBI and others and/or assist to alleviate the
situation without violence. When the FBI was asked to provide access to
Charging Documents, the request was denied.
The meeting concluded at about 4:30 P.M. with a blunt statement by Agent
Canady that "no other outside negotiators would be allowed in at this
time".
It was with shock, dismay, and consternation that the Common Law Court
Officers heard on the 6:00 P.M. news that same day that a "religious
expert" was to be brought into Jordan, Montana, supposedly to assist the
FBI. It was also reported in the Denver Post that armor and
helicopters had been brought into the area of the siege. This was
another direct contradiction of Agent Canady's statements assuring the
Common Law Court Officers "that no action of any kind would be taking
place" in the near future ("for at least 3 weeks").
In addition to the meeting with the FBI, the team was also present in
Federal Court in Billings at 1:30 and witnessed Magistrate Anderson's
courtroom hearings for five Freemen already in custody. Subsequently,
they made several attempts to obtain copies of documents such as
warrants, affidavits, indictments, returns, etc., which are fundamental
to due process, and supposed to be public records, but were denied the
release of these documents by the Clerk of Federal Court. Attempts to
view or get a copy of Magistrate Anderson's Oath of Office was refused !
The team members also visited with incarcerated Freemen leader Leroy
Schweitzer in Yellowstone County Jail. Family members were also
contacted, and the Team Members performed other investigative work while
in the area. Leroy asks that everybody pray for him. He is in good
spirits and determined. He says the government is on the run !
To summarize the results of this goodwill, fact finding and assistance
endeavor, the team wishes to state that there is a definite credibility
gap between what is being said by government spokespersons and what is
actually being done by the FBI. As a consequence of all of their above
efforts, the team members were able to formulate a series of opinions
regarding what is really happening in Montana.
There is an interesting and very frightening correlation between what is
happening in the Billings Federal Courtroom and at the site of the siege
in Brusett.
On Thursday, May 30, 1996 at 1:30 P.M., AUSA Toscas, a government hired
gun who was brought in from Washington, DC, especially to prosecute the
Freemen, trampled on the due process protections, and rights of
prisoners Hansen, Waterhouse, Clark, Schweitzer, and Peterson, with the
obvious pre-planned and well rehearsed collusion of Magistrate Anderson.
Five times in succession, Magistrate Anderson, who was visibly and
plainly reading from a script of two series of papers, recited the
exact same litany in each case. The outcome, of course, was the same in
all five cases - no speedy trial. The government plead they did not have
evidence and discovery ready to give defense, and needed more time.
Even though several of the captives OBJECTED and stated that they waived
discovery and were ready for trial, Anderson, with obvious bias and
prejudice in favor of the government, put off all matters until July
1st or 6th.
Canady had stated that nothing would be done at the ranch for three
weeks. Did he know the outcome of those hearings even though they were
still in progress during the meeting with the Common Law Court Officers
? (He did state he was aware of and had requested the delay hearings).
Did he let it slip that the FBI would move on the hostages on the farm
before July 1st ? If he knew what was to occur, how did he know ? Why
would he lie to the team about bringing in new people (Arnold) ? Why
would he lie about a "cooling off period", knowing full well that he had
already ordered up an assortment of military armor, assault weapons,
helicopters, and who knows what else we don't know of ? Why would he
deliberately lie about a "cooling off period", knowing that he had
ordered the FBI to move the media back and to move his storm troopers in
closer ?
NOTE : Canady made it known that Leroy Schweitzer had placed a
$100,000,000.00 Lien on him, and he was MAD about it !
What's the real time line ? What is the real issue in this situation ?
Does FBI agent Canady want to move in with high tech weapons in order to
burn down the buildings and destroy the evidence that the Freemen are so
desperately trying to protect for ALL Americans ? Is this also to
destroy the Lien on FBI agent Canady ? What would happen if the
Freemen were successful in getting this evidence (that the FBI keeps
confiscating) out to the public? What's the government so afraid of ?
The government siege of a group of Americans on a farm in Brusett,
Montana gives us an opportunity to reflect on whether or not this
country has a caste system within its legal system. Is there a double
standard ? Might there be an elitist class favoritism of the rich
politicians, judges, attorneys, and bankers perpetrated by the judiciary
and government agencies upon the unsuspecting common man ? Is the
average working class American simply run through the revolving door of
the court system's revenue collection grinder and spit out of the
courthouse door poorer, downtrodden, confused, frustrated, intimidated,
and angry, yet powerless to do anything to change it ?
If we draw an analogy between the Montana siege and the now hushed-up
Congressional House Banking Scandal, we may find the answer to the above
questions. In the House Banking Scandal, dozens of members of the
highest governmental body in the land wrote hundreds of fraudulent and
bogus checks totaling millions of dollars. These were people in whom
the American people had placed an almost sacred trust. These were
people who had sworn an oath to do right, yet perjured that oath. These
were the same people who passed the laws on "bad checks" under which the
average citizen is arrested, brought into court and JAILED !
How many FBI and other government agents armed with assault weapons,
high tech electronic surveillance gear, armored vehicles, and battle
helicopters surrounded the Congressional Office Buildings in Washington
for months ? How many Congressmen were arrested, thrown in jail, denied
due process, tortured, and threatened with violence and/or death ?
This delegation is unable to recall any - can you?
Why not ask your Senators and Congressmen these questions ? While you
are at it, why not also ask the Governor of Montana why he allows armed
Federal government forces to invade the sovereign soil of Montana State.
All of the recent court cases on this issue have made it clear that
unless the Federal Government owns the property, they have no police
powers over it, no jurisdiction on it. Not to mention, the FBI is
UNchartered.
Careful analysis of the information gathered from a variety of sources,
coupled with a lot of compiled data, personal interviews, and mainstream
media stories points to a startling conclusion. It appears that the
real issue for the government and FBI is to obtain possession of, and
destroy or hide the massive amount of evidence of government and banking
fraud which has been accumulated by the Freemen and archived in the
buildings on the farm currently under siege by the FBI. Personal
interviews with Leroy Schweitzer and cellular phone conversations with
others still on the farm confirm this.
Further incontrovertible proof of this belief is provided by the FBI
themselves. Their heavily armed forces have seized and confiscated
almost every paper and set of documents that the Freemen have given to
visitors and so-called intermediaries such as "Bo" Gritz and Charles
Duke in their vain attempts to put this information before the American
public.
The government apparatus is OBVIOUSLY in high gear, applying their
overwhelming force and resources, intimidation, and threats, to crush a
politically motivated class of people. These Freemen are patriots who
dare to exercise their First Amendment rights and protections, which are
supposedly guaranteed to them (as well as to all Americans) by our
Constitution. They do not deserve to suffer this TERRORISM and to die
for exercising these rights.
It appears likely that there is a carefully orchestrated, pre-planned,
and practiced set of actions on the part of government agencies to
perpetrate this insidiously discriminatory, class-based plan with the
animus behind the conspirator's actions being to deprive the Freemen of
equal protection of the laws. If this is the case, each and all of
the Government people are liable, personally as well as in their
official capacity, for action under 42 USC 1985, 1986, 1983, 1988, 1981,
1621, 18 USC 241, 242, 1621 (perjury) 28 USC 453, 454, (Oath of Office
Violations) and a variety of others. If it is shown that their intent
all along was to define the Constitutionalists as a "Class" of
anti-government people, and that the government people have conspired
and agreed to do these things and destroy that class, they are also
liable under the Geneva Convention and the Tenants of Nuremberg, against
which Hitler's Gestapo and SS were tried. It appears that the
government is attempting to duplicate the Bosnian war criminals who are
now being tried for government sponsored "ethnic cleansing".
IS THE US GOVERNMENT GUILTY OF ETHNIC CLEANSING ?
RESTATEMENT OF THE ISSUE ;
The "Real Issue" behind all of the Federal government's armed intrusion
in Brusett, Montana state, into that sovereign state's soil, without
jurisdiction, justification, and/or any authority ; is the seizure and
destruction of the massive collection of evidence contained on the ranch
that the FBI has surrounded, at any cost in life and property without
regard for Law, Truth, or Morality.
The elitists in Federal and State government, along with those
controlling the banking and financial industry would be threatened if
the American Public knew the TRUTH about the Bankers' Secret "Money
Creation System" and all of the ongoing FRAUD that has been perpetrated
for way too long against the honest, hardworking, and UNSUSPECTING
Americans.
The collection of evidence being guarded with their lives by the Freemen
at the ranch, if exposed to the general Public, would be the Banker's
"Worst Nightmare Come True." The pretenses of those alleged crimes are
just that - a big, carefully orchestrated illusion for the media and the
public to focus on while the FBI destroys the evidence, which is the
REAL ISSUE. (Kahl, Beckman, Weaver, Waco, Murrah - now Montana ! )
Conversely, if the evidence could be removed from the ranch (and
protected) by a trusted third party, the FBI would probably go away and
stop the siege, at least for the time being. These are our personal
beliefs, based on our first hand knowledge obtained from meeting with
FBI agents and from being in the Federal Courthouse in Billings, Montana
on May 30, 1996, and discovering the other travesties and Government
Sponsored Destruction of the American Freedoms and way of life.
Also obvious is that in this highly Politically Charged election year,
with the world wide attentions focused on the Montana situation, there
can be absolutely no doubt that each and every move of the FBI and other
government agents involved in this atrocious breach of the Constitution,
Law, and Public Trust, is being monitored by, submitted to, and approved
by - Clinton, through Reno.
Never forget - Clinton is the Commander in Chief of the Military Forces
(is there any doubt the FBI is military?) and ultimately responsible for
everything they do - He's the Boss..... he keeps saying so.... and Reno
is his mouthpiece and equally responsible since she is supposed to be
the highest Law Enforcement Officer and in control ?? of the FBI they
brought in.
If you the public do not get involved NOW, we will see another WACO,
and more American men, women and children, who have yet to be proven
guilty of any crimes, BURNED TO DEATH, without due process, without
having an opportunity to present their defense before the American
people.
What the Freemen are doing, they are doing for YOU - America. The
evidence they have acquired can get the entire Nation out of Debt, can
get rid of the money scam so you don't have to work two jobs just to
scrape by, can allow your wife to stay home if she so chooses, instead
of HAVING to work because you can't feed and cloth your children.
PRESERVE THE EVIDENCE - YOUR TICKET TO FREEDOM
ALLOW THE FREEMEN TO HAVE ACCESS TO THE MEDIA AND A COMMON LAW GRAND JURY.
--
|
|