About
Community
Bad Ideas
Drugs
Ego
Erotica
Fringe
Society
Technology
Phreak
Boxes, Old and New
Bugs and Taps
Cellular Phones
Introduction to Telecommunications
PBX's and Switches
Payphones
Phone Phun
VMB's, Pagers, E-Mail, and S&F Systems
register | bbs | search | rss | faq | about
meet up | add to del.icio.us | digg it

Tapping computers for data - TEMPEST


NOTICE: TO ALL CONCERNED Certain text files and messages contained on this site deal with activities and devices which would be in violation of various Federal, State, and local laws if actually carried out or constructed. The webmasters of this site do not advocate the breaking of any law. Our text files and message bases are for informational purposes only. We recommend that you contact your local law enforcement officials before undertaking any project based upon any information obtained from this or any other web site. We do not guarantee that any of the information contained on this system is correct, workable, or factual. We are not responsible for, nor do we assume any liability for, damages resulting from the use of any information on this site.


Dec 27 21:24 1985 data.tap Page 1

--FEATURE ARTICLES AND REVIEWS-

TAPPING COMPUTER DATA IS EASY, AND CLEARER THAN PHONE CALLS !

BY RIC BLACKMON, SYSOP OF A FED BBS
Aquired by Lunatic Labs
Uploaded by Elric of Imrryr
-------------------------------

FOR SEVERAL YEARS, I ACCEPTED CERTAIN BITS OF MISINFORMATION
AS TECHNICALLY ACCURATE, AND DIDN'T PROPERLY PURSUE THE MATTER. SEVERAL
FOOLS GAVE ME FOOLISH INFORMATION, SUCH AS:
A TAP INTERRUPTS COMPUTER DATA TRANSMISSIONS; DATA COULD BE PICKED UP
AS RF EMANATIONS BUT IT WAS A MASS OF UNINTELLIGIBLE SIGNAL CAUSED BY DATA
MOVING BETWEEN REGISTERS; ONE HAD TO BE IN 'SYNC' WITH ANY SENDING COMPUTER;
DATA COULDN'T BE READ UNLESS YOU HAD A DIRECT MATCH IN SPEED, PARITY & BIT
PATTERN; AND ONLY A COMPUTER OF THE SAME MAKE AND MODEL COULD READ THE
SENDING COMPUTER. THIS IS ALL PLAIN SWILL. IT IS IN FACT, AN EASIER CHORE
TO TAP A COMPUTER THAN A TELEPHONE. THE TECHNIQUE AND THE EQUIPMENT IS ALMOST
THE SAME, BUT THE COMPUTER LINE WILL BE MORE ACCURATE (THE TWO COMPUTERS
INVOLVED, HAVE ERROR CORRECTING PROCEDURES) AND CLEARER (DIGITAL
TRANSMISSIONS HAVE MORE DISTINCT SIGNALS THAN ANALOG TRANSMISSIONS).

FIRST, RECOGNIZE THAT NEARLY ALL DATA TRANSMISSIONS ARE SENT IN CLEARTEXT
ASCII SIGNALS. THE LINES CARRYING OTHER BIT-GROUPS OR ENCYPHERED TEXTS ARE
RARE. SECOND, THE SIGNAL APPEARS ON GREEN AND RED (WIRES) OF THE PHONE LINE
('TIP' AND 'RING'). THE DATA IS MOST LIKELY ASYSCHRONOUS SERIAL DATA MOVING
AT 300 BAUD. NOW THAT 1200 BAUD IS BECOMING MORE CHIC, YOU CAN EXPECT TO
FIND A GROWING USE OF THE FASTER
TRANSMISSION RATE. FINALLY, YOU DON'T NEED TO WORRY ABOUT THE PROTOCOL OR
EVEN THE BAUD RATE(SPEED) UNTIL AFTER A TAPED COPY OF A TRANSMISSION IS
OBTAINED.

IN A SIMPLE EXPERIMENT, A TAPED COPY OF A DATA TRANSMISSION WAS MADE
WITH THE CHEAPEST OF TAPE RECORDERS, TAPPING THE GREEN AND RED LINES BEYOND
THE MODEM. THE RECORDING WAS THEN PLAYED INTO A MODEM AS THOUGH IT WERE AN
ORIGINAL TRANSMISSION. AT THAT POINT, HAD IT BEEN NECESSARY, THE PROTOCOL
SETTINGS ON RECEIVING TERMINAL COULD HAVE BEEN CHANGED TO MATCH THE TAPE. NO
ADJUSTMENTS WERE NECESSARY AND A NICE, CLEAR ERROR-FREE DOCUMENT WAS RECEIVED
ON THE ILLICIT VIDEO SCREEN AND A NEAT HARD-COPY OF THE DOCUMENT CAME OFF THE
PRINTER. THE MESSAGE WAS INDEED CAPTURED, BUT HAD IT BEEN AN
INTERCEPTION INSTEAD OF A SIMPLE MONITORING, IT COULD HAVE BEEN ALTERED
WITH A SIMPLE WORD PROCESSOR PROGRAM, TO SUIT ANY PURPOSE, AND PLACED BACK ON
THE WIRE.

WERE I TO HAVE AN INTEREST IN INFORMATION ORIGINATING FROM A
PARTICULAR COMPANY, AGENCY, OR OFFICE, I THINK THAT I WOULD FIND IT FAR MORE
PRODUCTIVE TO TAP A DATA TRANSMISSION THAN TO TAP A VOICE TRANSMISSION, AND
EVEN MORE REWARDING THAN GETTING HARDCOPY DOCUMENTS.

*SIGNIFICANT & IMPORTANT INFORMATION IS MORE CONCENTRATED IN A
DATA TRANSMISSION.
*SIGNIFICANT & IMPORTANT INFORMATION IS MORE EASILY LOCATED IN
DATA TRANSMISSIONS THAN IN MASSES OF FILES OR PHONE CALLS.
*TRANSMITTED DATA IS PRESUMED TRUE, AND WHEN ALTERATION IS





Dec 27 21:24 1985 data.tap Page 2

DISCOVERED, ITS READILY BLAMED ON THE EQUIPMENT.
*THE LAWS CONCERNING TAPS ON UNCLASSIFIED AND NON-FINANCIAL COMPUTER
DATA ARE EITHER QUITE LACKING OR ABJECTLY STUPID.

THE POINT OF ALL THIS IS THAT THE PRUDENT MANAGER REALLY OUGHT TO ENCRYPT
ALL DATA TRANSMISSIONS. ENCRYPTION PACKAGES ARE CHEAP (A 'DES' PROGRAM IS
NOW PRICED AT $30) AND ARE EASY TO USE.

-------------------------------

Editor's Note: This file was aquired by me from a BBS, the is for 'Computer
Security' people only (hehehehe). If you want to fone # just e-mail me. But
please don't crash the board, if is much more valuable up and running where
we can keep an eye on it & THEM.
-Elric of Imrryr
Co-Founder of Lunatic Labs
This file was format for 80 column printing on a UNIX System
































 
To the best of our knowledge, the text on this page may be freely reproduced and distributed.
If you have any questions about this, please check out our Copyright Policy.

 

totse.com certificate signatures
 
 
About | Advertise | Bad Ideas | Community | Contact Us | Copyright Policy | Drugs | Ego | Erotica
FAQ | Fringe | Link to totse.com | Search | Society | Submissions | Technology
Hot Topics
Php
Withstanding an EMP
Good computer destroyer?
Wow, I never thought the navy would be so obvious.
Alternatives Internets to HTTP
Anti-Virus
a way to monitor someones AIM conversation
VERY simple question: browser history
 
Sponsored Links
 
Ads presented by the
AdBrite Ad Network

 

TSHIRT HELL T-SHIRTS