About
Community
Bad Ideas
Drugs
Ego
Erotica
Fringe
Society
Law
... and Justice for All
High Profile Legal Cases
Legal Forms
Technology
register | bbs | search | rss | faq | about
meet up | add to del.icio.us | digg it

Paper on IRS and INDEMNIFICATION


IRS/SS NOTICE & REQUEST FOR INDEMNIFICATION

>> Re NOTICE & REQUEST FOR INDEMNIFICATION:
>> Who has actually tried sending this to the government (addresses below)???
>> Has there been any reply ?? Do they laugh at you ?? Threaten you ??
>> Ignore you ?? (BTW: Is Dorcas Hardy still SSA commissioner?)

Though I have not yet read this particular posting... I have personally
sent Revocations of both Social Security and "my" Birth Certificate. Thus
far I have not received any reply concerning "my" BC, though I am about to
send off an FOIA request to the agency concerned. The SSA is another
matter. I received a "polite" one page [form] letter from the alleged
"Chief, Correspondence Section" claiming my Asseveration was "irrelevant."
To "back" their claim they cited United States v. Lee (455 U.S. 252), a
supreme Court ruling concerning an Amish employer (Mr. Lee) who refused
Social Security payments based upon religious exemption - IRC @ 1402(g).
Summarily, the Court stated that "mandatory" participation in Social
Security did not violate Mr. Lee's First Amendment protected rights, IOW:
he didn't qualify for the exemption.

***Keep in mind, now, that a Court must only address the issue(s) brought
before it (Brushaber v. Union Pacific, a classic case). The Court, in this
case, ruled properly based upon the issue brought before it - Mr. Lee's
non-participation in Social Security based upon claim of religious
exemption (this is why it is sooooo important for all patriots to bring
their issues before the Court properly and completely, and in the pretense
upon which the Court is desired to rule -- a lot of bad case law has been
built-up as the result of poorly planned issues and poorly prepared
dockets).
Furthermore, for a citation to have a legal premise, whether Mandatory
or Persuasive, it must be applied to a case of similar issue.***

The SSA's response was/is entirely fraudulent based upon this cite: 1) the
issue brought before the Court in U.S. v. Lee is one of religious exemption
-- NOWHERE in my Asseveration to the SSA was a protestation based upon
religious preference ever raised; 2) the exemption being claimed by Mr. Lee
(the entire premise of the case) is found among a list of definitions (IRC
@ 1402) for "Tax on Self-Employment Income" (IRC Chapter 2) -- Nordby
Supply Co. notwithstanding, I am not "self-employed" and could not qualify
for exemption under 1402(g) even if my asseveration had dared to claim it
WHICH IT DID NOT(!).

{ It should be quite clear by now just what kind of criminal behavior we
are up against! }

(BTW: Ms. Hardy hasn't been Commissioner of SSA since about '88 or '89.
Don't recall off the top of my head who the current Commissioner is...)

>> Has anyone been cocky enough to send these ??

I think it is obvious by now that I certainly have been. I've also been
cocky enough to send numerous Affidavits, Asserverations, Notices, and
other documentary correspondence to the IRS in my ongoing struggle with
them.

>> To tell the truth, these documents sound so dramatic and unusual
>> and are sooooo long that I wonder if the gov't employees receiving
>> them will just chuck them in the circular file. I mean, after all,

Of course, it is always a possibility that they might do just that, however
it is highly unlikely. More likely it will go into a Patriot Activity File
(PAF) kept on all "undesirables" and "suspected revolutionaries" and stored
in the huge databases at FINCEN and Mt. Weather. !:-o In any case, all
such correspondence should be sent via Certified [Return Receipt] mail
(number should also be on the document in question). Then if it ever
becomes a matter for the courts, proof of receipt can be presented. It is
also a good idea to retain a copy of the document for your own records
should the recipient party manage to "lose" theirs. Take your copy with
you to the Post Office and ask the clerk to postmark it.

>> I sometimes can't even get my U.S. Senators to answer one
>> straightforward, to-the-point question which takes only about a
>> half a page letter.

Be fair now... our U.S. Senators a quite busy coming up with wonderful new
laws for our benefit. ;-) Besides, Congressional Aides normally handle
most correspondence... maybe the one who got yours didn't understand the
question...

>> Do the various Directors, Commissioners, and Secretaries actually
>> take these requests seriously and bother to plow through all the
>> heady legalese therein and generate an answer ?? Or are these
>> just dismissed as the rantings of a flaky anarchist and simply
>> flipped into the wastebasket?

Same for these types as for Congressman. However, when these types are
named in court proceedings they are responsible to appear (which they
probably do by delegation, unless the case is specific, ie. a lawsuit). As
for "plowing through the heady legalese" they have well staffed legal
departments to do that for them. However, despite the size of the document
sent to them, they probably just instruct their "Chiefs, Correspondence
Sections" to flit off a standard form-letter response based upon best
guestimates of what the doc in question concerns (like mine). {Probably
with a high rate of success based upon the often correct presumption that
the Patriot in question would simply let it go at that... "Welp, I tried
and they said 'no.' No since in pushing the beast." Unfortunately, they
know that most would-be Patriots are too secure in what they have and are
leary of losing it for pushing the wrong buttons on the machine... not
realizing that nothing we have is really "secure" since they could take it
anytime they wanted to anyway. It's a sad state... one we all must begin
to do something about, starting with getting informed.}

>> Inquiring minds want to know!

Hope I did better than your average supermarket tabloid in quenching your
desire for knowledge.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
INTERESTED IN PATRIOT/ANTI-NEW WORLD ORDER-CFR-TRILATERALIST-FED RESERVE-
BILDERBERGER/RELATED ISSUES FILES?

DOWNLOAD NWOFILES.TXT [or, on some BBS systems, NWOFILES.ZIP] FOR A
COMPREHENSIVE LISTING OF SUCH FILES AVAILABLE ON *THIS* BBS. OR
DOWNLOAD IT, AND THEM, FROM CRS ONLINE IN TORONTO.

YOU ARE ENCOURAGED TO WIDELY RE-POST THAT INDEX FILE, AND THE INDIVIDUAL
FILES LISTED IN IT, TO OTHER BBS SYSTEMS!

 
To the best of our knowledge, the text on this page may be freely reproduced and distributed.
If you have any questions about this, please check out our Copyright Policy.

 

totse.com certificate signatures
 
 
About | Advertise | Bad Ideas | Community | Contact Us | Copyright Policy | Drugs | Ego | Erotica
FAQ | Fringe | Link to totse.com | Search | Society | Submissions | Technology
Hot Topics
Ed & Elaine Brown * Shots Fired *
Why are we stalling on Darfur?
george galloway what do you think of him?
Hinchey Amendment
why UK accepts US subjugation and infiltration?
George galloway suspended from HP
Why Marxism IS Economically Exploitive...
Situation in Turkey
 
Sponsored Links
 
Ads presented by the
AdBrite Ad Network

 

TSHIRT HELL T-SHIRTS

 
www.pigdog.org