|
Kinetic Energy Weapons
Kinetic Energy Weapons (KEWs) verses Lorentz 05/20/88
For those of you who may have just tuned in, you may be
wondering why, we are discussing Kinetic Energy Weapons (KEWs for
short) here. It started with my question on which issue of
"The American Rifleman", had info on a Railgun (Does any one
know the issue?). I'll speculate that mention of Railguns
was prompted by the article in Circuit Cellar Ink #2,
"Circuit Cellar Neighborhood Strategic Defense
Initiative[,] The Ballistic Dynamics of Plastic Soda Bottles"
by Steve Ciarcia & Ed Nisley. So here we are at: "Kinetic
Energy Weapons (KEWs) verses Lorentz".
Also related is the 'thread' of messages on making the
Plastic Soda Bottle into a capacitor, and charging it to a high
voltage potential to increase lift, with out increasing fuel.
Its taken me a lot longer to get this message composed
that I thought it would, some of the references, to say the least
are obscure, and took time to find them.
I want to explain some thing here, I'am not a physicist, nor
have I had any formal education in such areas. I simply have a
desire read things that most people, politely, term esoteric and
ignore with out further thought. My desire to read the esoteric
has resulted in me accumulating a rather large collection of
odds-and-ends that "don't fit in" with accepted physical "Laws",
for example: Railgun verses Lorentz.
The one common tread that runs between all of these odds-
and-ends, is that there is usually some 'anomalies' to each of
the "Laws", that the "Law" it self does not account for, at some
scale. My view is that if it is a "Law" it should work no mater
what the scale, from microscopic to macroscopic. As an example
Lorentz's law didn't break down until some one tried to use
macroscopic currents in a Railgun.
Here are the specific references to Kinetic Energy Weapons
[Any one know where I can get more of such info?]:
1)
"Railgun Research Shoots Holes In Lorentz's Theory": pg 49;
"Railgun Research Shoots Holes In Lorentz Law Of
Electromagnetism": pg 50; by Chappell Brown; Electronic
Engineering Times Monday, April 6, 1987 pg 49
2)
"Anomalies In Electromagnetic Law Spur Debate" pg 58, by Chappell
Brown; Electronic Engineering Times Monday, September 14, 1987.
3)
"Electrons And Conduction: Not So Simple After All": pg 21;
"Lorentz No Longer Gives Answers Ampere's Theory Holds Clues to
Current Problem": pg 22, by Chappell Brown, Electronic
Engineering Times, Monday, December 28, 1987
4)
"Debate Over Use Of Energy Weapons Thrives" pg 41, by ? Van
Nostrand; Electronic Engineering Times, Monday, September 7, 1987
5)
"Dusting Off An Old Idea: Shooting Into Orbit": pg 37, by
Chappell Brown; Electronic Engineering Times, Monday, August 31,
1987
6)
Defense Electronics, May 1988 Vol. 20, #5, "SDI: More Spin-Offs
Than Apollo?" Pg 39-45, by J.W.R
From Ref #2: "It is important to realize that the mismatch
between theory and observation is not some barely discernible
quantity. [It] involves factors in the thousands." So says
Peter Graneau, a Physicist at Northeastern University's Center of
Electromagnetics Research, commenting on anomalies in Lorentz's
force law. The situation is more than academic bickering, since
the formula is one of the pillars of relativity theory." ....
"Graneau has shown that objects move, buckle and break under
forces that are not found in current electromagnetic equations."
From Ref #3: "...the Ampere and Lorentz laws only agree for
closed circuits. When the source of the electromagnetic effect
is isolated current element, a large discrepancy appears."
"Amperean forces also explain the wire fragmentation that occurs
at high currents. Current-element analysis also explains the
existence of the longitudinal electromagnetic waves that were
observed by Radio pioneer Nikola Tesla. Because such waves
cannot be derived from Maxwell's equations, Tesla's experiments
were ignored..." [Or were they actively suppressed? See the
references referring to T. E. Bearden, and Scalar waves.]
From ref #5: "A physicist [Peter Graneau] at Northeastern
University has found that current pulses in water can develop
strong forces which, when contained in a gun barrel, produce
unprecedented muzzle velocities." .... "...Northeastern's new
electromagnetics research center has uncovered a new
'electrodynamic' phenomenon, dubbed the "alpha torque," that only
manifests it self in liquid conductors like air, water and molten
metals. The results show that the new method of propulsion can
easily out perform both chemical explosives and electromagnetic
rail guns." .... " The crucial issue is how electric arcs
generate these forces in fluids. We have given up on
thermodynamic explanations. Ruling out gravitational and nuclear
forces, there really remains no choice but to seek an
electrodynamic explanation," .... "Graneau calculates that a 2-
million-amp arc explosion in a 350-meter barrel would accelerate
a 20-kg projectile to 13 km per second." .... "Graneau has had to
resurrect an older formulation of electromagnetic theory in order
to explain the arc explosions. The theory was originated by the
French physicist Andre-Marie Ampere at the beginning of the 19th
century and was further elaborated by A. F. Neuman in Germany."
modern formulation, the Lorentz formula that governs the movement
of electrons in electromagnetic fields." .... "Applying the
Lorentz formula to the water arc experiments leads to an entirely
different prediction of the propagated forces. A much smaller
force acting to contain the plasma was predicted, and this helped
derail applications of arc forces."
Here is a few notes of my own, Lightning is a arc force,
what is some thing useful we can do with it?. The projectiles
that are fired by KEWs must survive, and maintain there
aerodynamic properties, when they impact with the air at the end
of their muzzles. Firing a bullet at 10 km per second into air,
would be like you driving your car into a brick wall at 1000 mph;
instant pan-cake. Some type of ceramic material would probably
be the best avenue to pursue for the projectile.
Can we pick up some distilled water, or maybe mineral water
(a good point to experiment with), at the super market, a few
dozen 300,000 uF caps at a hamfest, and make our own arc force
powered 'Plastic Soda Bottle' launcher, with out blowing our self
up?
I brought up (a)ether, and you brought up Miclson-and-
Morroson experiment, so lets see where we can go with that:
This is what my dictionary has to say about (a)ether:
E-ther:
Noun.
1) Chem.
a.) A colorless, mobile, volatile, aromatic liquid compound,
ethyl oxide, (C2H5)2O, made by the action of sulfuric acid on
alcohol: used as an anesthetic and solvent.
b.) Any of a group of organic compounds in which an oxygen atom
is joined with two organic radicals.
2) A solid or semi-solid, perfectly elastic medium formerly
[?] assumed to pervade all of space and to be responsible for
the transmission of light, heat, gravitational effects, and all
forms of energy and radiation.
3) The upper air.
Also spelled "AETHER" (for defs. 2 and 3).
[<L aether sky <Gk. aither < aithein burn, shine]
I'll go with the 'aether' spelling from here on out, so that
the "aromatic liquid" of definition number one (1) doesn't smell
up the place.
The Miclson-and-Morroson experiment, of 1881 and 1887,
proved that aether didn't exists? Well you are correct; almost.
M&M set out to prove, or disprove, that the "perfectly elastic
[static] medium assumed to pervade all of space" did, or did not,
exist. Or to put it an other way, since it was believed the
aether was stationary in space, which the Earth passed trough,
there would be a aether 'wind'.
The M&M experiment did virtually prove for certain that a
static aether, or aether wind, DID NOT exist. Did I just shot
my self in the foot, when I said aether did not exist? No, I
didn't, I said they proved that a STATIC aether (or aether wind)
did not exists. How come if the M&M apparatus is oriented in
different directions it produces different results, not greatly
different, but different none the less? Could it be that M&M did
not consider, at that time, that a Dynamic Aether might exists,
one where the aether is constantly in motion, with intense local
rotary, and wave movements within the aether space? [Was the
directinality thing just one more anomaly in physics that got
swept under the rug, when it couldn't be correlated to the
desired out come of the experiment?]
The following statement would be considered heresy by the
Relativity crowd...but take note of who said it:
"According to the general theory of relativity, space
without ether is unthinkable; for in such a space there not only
would be no propagation of light, but also no possibility of
existence for standards of space and time [measuring rods and
clocks] nor therefore any space-time intervals in the physical
sense." -- Albert Einstein, from an obscure speech in Leiden,
Germany; 1920. [Did you catch the name there: Albert Einstein?]
--- See "Sidelights of Relativity" by Albert Einstein, London,
1922 pg. 23.
That's all I've got time for at the moment, how about you?
Further references [Don't judge a book by it's cover {or it's
title}.]:
"Star Wars Now! The Bohm-Aharono Effect, Scalar Interferometry,
and Soviet Weaponization" by T. E. Bearden
"Soviet Research On Unified Field Theories, False Vacuum States,
and Antigravity (U)" -- Capt. Robert M. Collins (TQTR),
06/11/1986
"Soviet Research On The A-Vector Potential and Scalar Waves (U)"
-- Capt. Robert M. Collins (TQTR), 12/8/1986
"Tesla's Secret and The Soviet Tesla Weapons (Part I of II)" by
T. E. Bearden, in Energy Unlimited Fall 1981, #11.
"Tesla's Secret and The Soviet Tesla Weapons (Part II of II)" by
T. E. Bearden, in Energy Unlimited Winter 1981, #12.
"The Manual Of Free Energy Devices and Systems" by D. A. Kelly,
contains "Scalar Electromagnetics: A Quick Overview" by T. E.
Bearden
US Paten #4,204,212 "Conformal Spiral Antenna", patent rights
have been assigned to the US Army. [Related to Scalar waves.]
"Dr. Nieper's Revolution in Technology Medicine and Society" by
Hans A. Nieper; English edition May 1985
"How To Build A Flying Saucer And Other Proposals in Speculative
Engineering" by T. B. Pawlicki
"Relativity The Special and The General Theory" by Albert
Einstein
"The ABC's of Relativity; 4th revised edition" by Bertrand
Russell
I posted a message asking for help with a longitudinal
[Scalar] wave transceiver, made from a coil of wire and a Fer-
rite rod. So its not all that hard to make one, like some of
these references would lead you to believe....
|
|
