
The New Tesla Electromagnetics and the Secrets of Free Electrical Energy
by T. E. Bearden
A: Discrepancies in Present EM Theory
There are at least twentytwo major discrepancies presently
existing in conventional electromagnetcs theory. This paper
presends a summary of those flaws, and is a further commentary on
my discussio of scalar longitudinal waves in a previous paper, "S
olutions to Tesla's Secrets and the Soviet Tesla Weapons," Tesla
Book Company, 1981 and 1982.
I particularly wish to express my deep appreciation to two of
my friends and colleagues who at thi time, I believe, wish to
remain anonymous. One of the two is an experimental genius who
can produc items that do not work by orthodox theory. The secon
d is a master of materials science and electromagnetics theory. I
thank them both for their exceptioal contributions and stimuli
regarding potential shortcoming in present electromagnetics
theory, andtheir forbearance with the many discussions we have h
eld on this and related subjects.
It goes without saying that any etrors in this paper are
strictly my own, and not the fault of eiter of my distinguished
colleagues.
(1) In present electromagnetics theory, charge and charged mass
are falsely made identical. Actualy, on a charged particle, the
"charge" is the flux of virtual particles on the "bare particle"
of obervable mass. The charged particle is thus a "system"
of true massless charge coupled to a bare chargeless mass. The
observable "mass" is static, threedmensional and totally
spatial. "Charge" is dynamic, fourdimensional or more, virtual
and spatiotempral. Further, the charge and observable mass can be
decoupled, contrary to present theory. Decoupled charge  that
is, the absence of mass  is simplywhat we presently refer to as
"Vacuum." Vacuum, spacetime, and massless charge are all
identical. Riorously, we should utilize any of these three as an
"ether," as suggested for vacuum by Einstein himself (see Max
Born, Einstiein's Theory of Relativity,Revised Edition, Dover
Publications, New York, 1965, p. 224). And all three of them are
identically nenergy  not energy, but more fundamental component
s of energy.
(2) Electrostatic potential is regarded as a purely
3dimensional spatial stress. Instead, it is te intensity of a
manydimensional (at least fourdimensional) virtual flux and a
stress on all four imensions of spacetime. This is easily seen,
once one recognizes that spacetime is identically masless charged. (It
is not "filled" with charge; rather,it is charge!) Just as, in a
gas under pressure, the accumulation of additional gas further
stressesthe gas, the accumulation of charge (spacetime) stres
ses charge (spacetime). Further, if freed from its attachment to
mass, charge can flow exclusively i time, exclusively in space,
or in any combination of the two. Tesla waves  which are scalar
wavesin pure massless charge flux itself  thus can exhib
it extraordinary characteristics that ordinary vector waves do
not possess. And Tesla waves have exta dimensional degrees of
freedom in which to move, as compared to vector waves. Indeed,
one way to vsualize a tesla scalar wave is to regard it as a pure
oscillation of time itself.
(3) Voltage and potential are often confused in the
electrostatic case, or at least thought of as composed of the
same thing." For that reason, voltage is regarded as "potential
drop." This also is ot true. Rigorously, the potential is the
intensity of the virtual particle flux at a single point  whether or not
there is any mass at the point  an both the pressure and the
point itself are spatiotemporal (4dimensional) and not spatial
(3dimensonal) as presently assumed. Voltage represents th
e spatial intersection of the difference in potential
between two seperated spatial points, ad always implies at
least a miniscule flow of mass current (that is what makes it
spatial!). "Voltag" is spatial and depends upon the presence of
observable mass flow, while scalar electrostatic potential is
spatiotemporal and depends upon the absence o observable mass
flow. The two are not even of the same dimensionality.
(4) The charge of vacuum spacetime is assumed to be zero, when
in fact it is a very high value. Vauum has no mass, but it has
great massless charge and virtual particle charge flux. For proof
that acharged vacuum is the seat of something in motion, se
e G. M. Graham and D. G. Lahoz, "Observation of static
electromagnetic angular momentum in vacuo," Nture, Vol. 285, 15
May 1980, pp. 154155. In fact, vacuum IS charge, identically,
and it is also spaetime, and at least fourdimensional.
(5) Contrary to its present usage, zero is dimensional and
relative in its context. A threedimensonal spatial hole, for
example, exists in time. If we model time as a dimension, then
the spatial hoe has one dimension in 4space. So a spatial
absence
is a spatiotemporal presence. In the vacuum 4space, a spatial
nothing is still a something. The "vitual" concept and
mathematical concept of a derivative are simply two present ways
of unconsciously ddressing this fundamental problem of the
dimensional
relativity of zero.
(6) The concepts of "space" and "time" imply that spacetime
(vacuum) has been seperated into two prts. We can only think of a
space as "continuing to exist in time." To separate vacuum
spacetime nto two pieces, an operation is continually requir
ed. The operator that accomplishes this splitting operation is
the photon interaction, the interactin of vector electromagnetic
energy or waves with mass. I have already strongly pointed out
this effet and presented a "raindrop model" or firstorder phy
sical change itself in my book, The Excalibur Briefing,
Strawberry Hill Press, San Francisco, 1980,pp. 128130.
(7) "Vector magnetic potential" is assumed to be always an
aspect of (and connected to) the magnetc field. In fact it is a
separate, fundamental field of nature and it can be entirely
disconnected fom the magnetic field. See Richard P. Feynman et
al,
The Feynman Lectures on Physics, AddisonWesley Publishing Co.,
New York, 1964, Vol. II, pp. 158 to1514. Curiously, this fact
has been proven for years, yet it has been almost completely
ignored in he West. The "(triangle)x" operator, when applied to
the Afield, makes Bfield. If the (triangle)x operator is not
applied, the "freed" Afield possesse muchexpanded
characteristics from those presently allowed in the "bound"
theory. Specifically, it ecomes a scalar or "shadow vector"
field; it is not a
normal vector field.
(8) The speed of light in vacuum is assumed to be a fundamental
constant of nature. Instead it is function of the intensity of
the massless charge flux (that is, of the magnitude of the
electrostatc potential) of the vacuum in which it moves. (Indeed
, since vacuum and masless charge are one and the same, one may
say that the speed of light is a funtion of the intensity of the
spatiotemporal vacuum!). The higher the flux intensity (charge)
of the acuum, the faster the speed of light in it. This is a
n observed fact and already shown by hardcore measurements. For
example, distinct differences actualy exist in the speed of
light in vacuo, when measured on the surface of the earth as
compared to mesurements in space away from planetary masses. In a
vacuum on the surface of the earth, light moves significantly
faster. For a discussion and the statisics, see B. N. Belyaev,
"On Random Fluctuations of the Velocity of Light in Vacuum,"
Soviet Physics ournal, No. 11, Nov. 1980, pp. 3742 (original in
Russian, translation by Plenum Publishing Corporation.) The
Russians have used this knowledge for overtwo decades in their
strategic psychotronics (energetics) program; yet hardly a single
U.S. scientis is aware of the measured variation of c in vacuo.
In
fact, most Western scientists simply cannot believe it when it
is pointed out to them!
(9) Energy is considered fundamental and equivalent to work. In
fact, energy arises from vector prcesses, and it can be
disassembled into more fundamental (anenergy) scalar components,
since the vecors can. These scalar components individually can be
moved to a distant location without expending work, since one is
not moving force vectors. There thescalar components can be
joined and reassembled into vectors to provide "free energy"
appearing at adistance, with no loss in between the initial and
distant points. For proof that a vector field can be replaced by
(and considered to be composed of) twoscalar fields, see E. T.
Whittaker, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, Volume
1, 1903, . 367. By extension, any vector wave can be replaced
by two coupled scalar waves.
(10) The classical Poynting vector predicts no longitudinal
wave of energy from a timevarying, elctrically charged source.
In fact, an exact solution of the problem does allow this
longitudinal wav. See T. D. Keech and J. F. Corum, "A New
Derivation
for the Field of a TimeVarying Charge in Einsteins Theory,"
International Journal of Theoretical Phsics, Vol. 20, No. 1,
1981, pp. 6368 for the proof.
(11) The present concepts of vector and scalar are severely
limited, and do not permit the explici consideration of the
internal, finergrained structures of a vector or a scalar.
That is, a funamental problem exists with the basic
assumptions in the vector mathematics itself. The "space" of a vector field,
for example, does not have internesed sublevels (subspaces)
containing finer "shadow vectors" or "virtual vectors." Yet
particle physic has already discovered that electrical reality is
built that way. Thus one should actually use a "hypernumber" theory
after the manner of Charles Muses.A scalar is filled with (and
composed of) nested levels of other "spaces" containing vectors,
where hese sum to "zero" in the ordinary observable frame w
ithout an observable vector resultant. In Muses' mathematics, for
example, zero has real roots. Realphysical devices can be  and
have been  constructed in accordance with Muses' theory. For an
intoduction to Muses' profound hypernumberss approach, s
ee Charles Muses' forward to Jerome Rothstein, Communication,
Ogranization and Science, The Falcon'sWing Press, Indian Hills,
Colorado, 1958. See also Charles Muses', "Applied Hypernumbers:
Computatioal Convepts," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Vo
l. 3, 1976. See also Charles Muses' "Hypernumbers II", Aoplied
Mathematics and Computation, Janurary 1978.
(12) With the expanded Tesla electromagnetics, a new
conservation of energy law is required. Let u recapitulate for a
moment. The oldest law called for the conservation of mass. The
present law call for the conservation of "mass and energy", but
not each separately. If mass is regarded as simply another aspect of
energy, then the present law calls fr the conservation of energy.
However, this assumes that energy is a basic, fundamental
concept. Sine the energy concept is tied to work and the movement
of vector forces, it implicitly assumes "vector movement2 to be
a "most fundamental" and irreducibl concept. But as we pointed
out, Whittaker showed that vectors can always be further broken
down int more fundamental coupled scalar components. Further,
Tesla discovered that these "coupled components" of "energy" can
be individually separated, transmited, processed, rejoined, etc.
This directly implies that energy per se need not be conserved.
The nw law therefore calls for the conservation of anenerg
y, the components of energy. These components may be coupled into
energy, and the energy may be furter compacted into mass. It is
the sum total of the (anenergy) components  coupled and
uncoupled that is conserved, not the matter or the energy per s
e. Further, this conservation of anenergy is not spatial; rather
it is spatiotemporal in a spacetimeof at least four or more
dimensions.
(13) Relativity is presently regarded as a theory or statement
about fundamental physical reality.In fact, it is only a
statement about FIRST ORDER reality  the reality that
emerges from th vector interaction of electromagnetic energy
with
matter. When we break down the vectors into scalars (shadow
vectors or hypervectors), we immediatlyenter a vastly different,
far more fundamental reality. In this reality superluminal
velocity, multile universes, travel back and forth in time,
higher dimensions, variation of all "fundamental constants" of nature,
materialization and dematerialization and violation of the
"conservation of energy" are all involved. Even our present
Aristotlean logic  fitted to the photon interaction by vector
light as
the fundamental observation mechanism  is incapable of
describing or modeling this more fundamentl reality. Using scalar
waves and scalar interactions as much subtler, far less limited
observation/etection mechanisms, we must have a new "superrelativ
ity" to describe the expanded electromagnetic reality uncovered
by Nikola Tesla.
(14) "Charge" is assumed to be quantized, in addition to always
occuring with  and locked to mass. Indeed, charge is not
necessarily quantized, just as it is not necessarily locked to
mass. Ehrnhaft discovered and reported fractional charges for
years, in the 30's and 40's, and was ignored. See P.A.M. Dirac,
"Development of the Physicist's Concption of Nature", Sumposium
on the Development of the Physicist's Conception of Nature, ed.
Jagdish erha, D. Reidel, Boston, 1973, pp. 1214 for a presen
tation of some of Ehrenhaft's results. Within the last few years
Stanford University researchers hav also positively demonstrated
the existence of "fractional charge." For a layman's description
of thir work, see "A Spector Haunting Physics," Science Ne
ws, Vol. 119, January 31, 1981, pp. 6869. Indeed, Dirac in his
referenced article points out that Mllikan himself  in his
original oildrop experiments  reported one measurement of
fractional chare, but discounted it as probably due to error.
(15) Presently, things are always regarded as traveling through
normal space. Thus we use or modelonly the most elementary type
of motion  that performed by vector electromagnetic energy. We
do no allow for things to "travel inside the vector flow i
tself." Yet, actually, there is a second, more subtle flow inside
the first, and a third, even more ubtle flow inside the second,
and so on. We may operate inside, onto, into, and out of energy
itself and any anenergy component of energy. There are hy
pervectors and hyperscalars unlimited , within the ordinary
vectors and scalars we already know. Furher, these "interlan
flows" can be engineered and utilized, allowing physical reality
itself to be drectly engineered, almost without limits.
(16) We always assume everything exists in time. Actually,
nothing presently measured exists in tie, because the physicical
detection/measurement process of our present instruments destroys
time, riping it off and tossing it away  and thereby "colla
psing the wave function." Present scientific methodology thus is
seriously flawed. It does not yieldfundamental (spacetime) truth,
but only a partial (spatial) truth. This in turn leads to great
scienific oversights. For example. mass does not exist in
time, but mass x time (masstime) does. A fundamental constant
does not exist in time, but "constant time" does. Energy does
not exist in time, but energy x time (action) does. Even space
itself does ot exist in time  spacetime does. We are almost alw
ays one dimension short in every observable we model. Yet we
persist in thinking spatially, and we hve developed instruments
that detect and measure spatially only. Such instruments can
never measure nd detect the phenomenology of the nested substrata
of time. By using scalar technology, however, less limited
instruments can indeed be constructed  ad they have been. With
such new instruments, the phenomenology of the new
electromagnetics can be exlored and an engineering technology
developed.
(17) We do not recognize the connection between nested levels
of virtual state (particle physics) nd orthogonally rotated
frames (hyperspaces). Actually, the two are identical, as I
showed in the apendix to my book, The Excalibur Briefing,
Strawberry
Hills Press, San Francisco, 1980, pp. 233235. A virtual particle
in the laborotory frame is an obsevable particle in a
hyperspatial frame rotated more than one orthogonal turn away.
This of course imlies that the hyperspatial velocity of all
virtual particles is greater than the speed of light. The particle
physicist is already deeply involved in hyprspaces and
hyperspatial charge fluxes without realizing it. In other words ,
he is using tachyons (articles that move faster than light)
without realizi
ng it.
(18) Presently quantum mechanics rigorously states that time is
not an observable, and therefore i cannot be measured or
detected. According to this assumption, one must always infer
time from spatil measurements, because all detections and
measurements are spatial. With this assumption, our scientists prejudice
themselves against looking for finer,subquantal measurement
methodologies and instrumentation. Actually this present
limitation is the reult of the type of electromagnetics we
presently know, where all instruments (the "measurers") have been interacted
with by vector electromagnetic energy(light). Every mass that has
temperature (and all masses do!) is continually absorbing and
emitting hotons, and in the process they are continually conne
cting to time and disconnecting from time. If time is continually
being carried away from the detectr itself by its emitted
photons, then the detector cannot hold and "detect" that
which it has just lost. With Tesla electromagnetics,
however,
the fundamental limitation of our present instru ments need not
apply. With finer instruments, we cn show there are an infinite
number of levels to "time", and it is only the "quantum level
time" whih is continually being lost by vector light (photon)
interaction. By using subquantal scalar waves, instruments can
move to deeper levels of time  in wich case the upper levels of
time ARE measureable and detectable, in contradistinction to
present asumptions.
(19) In the present physics, time is modeled as, and considered
to be, a continuous dimension suchas length. This is only a gross
approximation. Indeed , time is not like a continuous
"dimension," bt more like a series of "stiches," each of which is
individually made and then ripped out before the next stitch
appears. "Vector light" photons interactone at a time, and it is
this interaction with mass that creates quantum change itself.
The absorbtin of a photon  which is energy x time  by a spati
al mass converts it to masstime: the time was added by the
photon. The emission of a photon tears awy the time, leaving
behind again a spatial mass. It is not accidental, then, that
time flows at the peed of light, for it is light which contains
and carries time. It is also not accidental that the photon IS the
individual quantum. Since all our instruents presently are
continually absorbing and emitting photons, they are all
"quantized," and they acordingly "quantize" their detections.
This is true be
cause all detection is totally internal to the detector, and the
instruments only detect only their wn internal changes. Since
these detections are on a totally granular quantized background,
the detetions themselves are quantized. The Minkowski model i
s fundamentally erroneous in its modeling of time, and for that
reason relativity and quantum mechancs continue to resist all
attempts to successfully combine them, quantum field theory
notwithstandin.
(20) Presently, gravitational field and electrical field are
considered mutually exclusive. Actualy this is also untrue. In
1974, for example, Santilli proved that electrical field and
gravitationalfiend indeed are not mutually exclusive. In that
case
one is left with two possibilities: (a) they are totally the
same thing, or (b) they are partially he same thing. For the
proof, see R. M. Santilli, "Partons and Gravitation: Some
Puzzling Questions, Annals of Physics, Vol. 83, No. 1, March
1974. With
the new Tesla electromagnetics, pure scalar waves in time itself
can be produced electrically , and lectrostatics (when the charge
has been seperated from the mass) becomes a "magic" tool capable
of drectly affecting anything that exists in time  incl
uding the gravitational field. Antigravity and the intertial
drive are immediate and direct consequnces of the new
electromagnetics.
(21) Presently, mind is considered metaphysical, not a part of
physics, and not affected by physicl means. Literally, the
prevailing belief of Western scientists is that man is a
mechanical robot even though relativity depends entirely upon
the idea
of the idea of the "observer." Western science today thus has
essentially become dogmatic, and in tis respect borders on a
religion. Since this "religion," so to speak, is now fairly well
entrenched n its power in the state, Western science is turning
itself into an oligarchy. But mind occupies time, and when we
measure and affect time, we can directy measure and affect mind
itself. In the new electromagnetics, then, Man regains his
dignity and hishumanity by restoring the reality of mind and
thought
to science. In my book, The Excalibur Briefing, I have already
pointed out the reality of mind and simplified way in which it
can be modeled to the first order. With scalar wave instruments,
the reaity of mind and thought can be measured in the laboratory, and parapsychology becomes a working, engineering,
scientific discipline.
(22) Multiple valued basic dimensional functions are either not
permitted or severely discouraged n the present theory. For one
thing, integrals of multiple valued derivative functions have the
annoing habit of "blowing up" and yielding erroneous answers, or none at all. And we certainly do not allow multiple types
of time! This leads to the absurdiy of the present interpretation
of relativity, which permits only a single observer (and a single
obervation) at a time. So if one believes as "absurd" a
thing as the fact that more than one person can observe an apple
at the same time, the present physcs fails. However, the
acceptance of such a simple proposition as multiple simultaneous
observationleads to a physics so bizarre and incredible that mos
t Western physicists have been unable to tolerate it, much less
examine its consequences. In the phyics that emerges from
multiple simultaneous observation, all possibilities are real and
physical. There are an infiite number of worlds, orthogonal to one another, and each world is continually splitting into
additional such "worlds" at a stupendous rat. Nonetheless, this
physics was worked out by Everett for his doctoral thesis in
1956, and the thess was published in 1957. (See Hugh Everett,
III, The
ManyWorlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics: A Fundamental
Exposition, with papers by J. A. Wheeer, B. S. DeWitt, L. N.
Cooper and D. Van Vechten, and N. Graham; eds. Bryce S. Dewitt
and Neill Graam, Princeton Series in Physics, Princeton
University
Press, 1973.) Even though it is bizarre, Everett's physics is
entirely consistent with the present xperimental basis of
physics. The present electromagnetic theory is constructed for
only a single "rdl" or universe  or "level." The expanded
theory, on the other hand, contains multiply nested levels of virtual
state charge  and these levels are idntically the same as
orthogonal universes, or "hyperframes." Multiple kinds  and
values  of timealso exist. The new concept differs from
Everett's, h
owever, in that the orthogonal universes intercommunicate in the
virtual state. That is, an observabe in one universe is always a
virtual quantity in each of the other universes. Thus one can
have mulilevel "continuities" and "discontinuities" simultan
eously, without logical conflict. It is precisely these levels of
charge  these levels of scalar vcuum  that lace together the
discontinuous quanta generated by the interaction of vector light
wit mass.
However, to understand the new electromagnetic reality, one
requires a new, expanded logic which cntains the old Aristotlean
logic as a subset. I have already pointed out the new logic in my
paper, A Conditional Criterion for Identity, Leading to a Fo
urth Law of Logic," 1979, available from the National Technical
Information Center, ADA071032.
Even as logic is extended, quantum mechanics, quantum
electrodynamics, and relativity are drasticaly changed by the
Tesla electromagnetics, as I point ed out in my paper,
"Solutions to Tesla's Secrts and the Soviet Tesla Weapons," Tesla
Book Company,
1580 Magnolia, Millbrae, CA, 94030, 1980.
The present electromagnetics is just a special case of
a much more fundamental electromgnetics discovered by Nikola
Tesla, just as Newtonian physics is a special case of the
relativistic hysics. But in the new electromagnetics case, the
differences between the old and the new are far more drastic and
profound.
Additional References
1. Boren, Dr. Lawence Milton, "Discovery of the Fundamental
Magnetic Charge (Arising from the new Coservation of Magnetic
Energy)," 1981/1982 (private communication). Dr. Boren has a
cogent argument tat the positron is the fundamental unit of
magnetic charge. His theory thus assigns fundamentally different natures to
positive charge and negative charg. In support of Dr. Boren, one
should point out that the "positive" end of circuits can simply
be "lss negative" than the "negative" end. In other words,
the circuit works simply from higher accumulation of negative
charges (the "negative" end) to a leser accumulation of negative
charges (the "positive" end). Nowhere needthere be positive
charges (proons, positrons, etc.) to make the circuit work. Dr. B
orens theory, though dramatic at first encounter, nonetheless
bears close and meticulous examination particularly since he
has been able to gather experimental data which support his
theory and disgree with present theory.
2. Eagle, Albert, "An Alternative Explanation of Relativity
Phenomena," philosophical Magazine and Jurnal of Science, No.
191, December 1939, pp. 694 701.
3. Ehrenaft, Felix and Wasser, Emanuel, "Determination of the
Size and Weight of Single Submicroscopc Spheres of the Order of
Magnitude r = 4 x 10(5) cm. to 5 x 10(6) cm., as well as the
Production f Real Images of Submicroscopic Particles by means of
Ultraviolet Light," Phil. Mag. and Jour. of Sci., Vol. II
(Seventh Series), No. 7, July 1926, pp. 351.
4. Ehrenhaft, Felix and Wasser, Emanuel, "New Evidence of the
Existance of Charges smaller than the lectron  (a) The
Micromagnet; (b) The Law of Resistance; © The computation of
errors of the Metho," Phil. Mag. and Jour. of Sci., Vol. V
(Seventh Series), No. 28, February 1928, pp. 225241.
5. See also Ehrenhaft's last paper dealing with the electronic
charge, in Philosophy of Science, Vo. 8, 1941, p. 403.
6. McGregor, Donald Rait, The Inertia of the Vacuum: A New
Foundation for Theoretical Physics, Expostion Press, Smithtown,
NY, First Edition, 1981, pp. 1520.
7. Ignat'ev, Yu. G. and Balakin, A. B., "Nonliner Gravitational
Waves in Plasma," Soviet Physics Jounal, Vol. 24, No. 7, July
1981, (U.S. Translation, Consultants Bureau, NY, JAnurary 1982),
pp. 59357.
8. Yater, Joseph C., "Relation of the second law of
thermodynamics to the power conversion of energyfluctuations,"
Phys. Review A, Vol. 20, no. 4, October 1979, pp. 16141618.
9. DeSantis, Romano M. et al, "On the Analysis of Feedback
Systems With a Multipower Open Loop Chain" October 1973,
available through the Defense Technical Information Center (AD
773188).
10. Graneau, Peter, "Electromagnetic JetPropulsion in the
Direction of current flow," Nature, Vol. 95, 28 Janurary 1982,
pp. 311312
11. "Gravity and acceleration aren't always equivalent," New
Scientist, 17 September 1981, p. 723.
12. Gonyaev, V. V., "Experimental Determination of the FreeFall
Acceleration of a Relativistic Chared Particle. II. A Cylindrical
Solenoid in a Time Independent Field of Inertial Forces,"
Izvestiya UZ, Fizika, No. 7, 1979, pp. 2832. English Translati
on: Soviet Physics Journal, No. 7, 1979, pp. 829833. If one
understands the new, expanded electromanetics, this Soviet paper
indicates a means of generating antigravity and pure inertial
fields.
13. R. Schaffranke, "The Development of PostRelativistic
Concepts in Physics and Advanced Technolog Abroad," Energy
Unlimited, No. 12, Winter 1981, pp. 1520.
14. F. K. Preikschat, A Critical look at the theory of
Relativity, Library of Congress Catalogue No.77670044. Extensive
compilation of measurements of the speed of light. Clearly shows
the speed of lght is not constant but changes, sometimes even
daily.
B: The Secret of Electrical Free Energy
Present electromagnetic theory is only a special case of the much
more funda mental electromagnetictheory discovered by Nikola
Tesla at the turn of the century.
Pure vacuum is pure charge flux, without mass. The vacuum has a
very high electrical potential  soething on the order of 200
million volts, with respect to a hypothetical zero charge.
Thus in an ordinary electrical circuit, each point of the
"ground"  which has the same potential a the vacuum  actually
has a nonzero absolute potential. This circuit ground has a
value of zero oly with respect to something else which has the
same
absolute electrical potential.
Voltage, which is always associated with a flow of electrical
"mass" current (even if only a miniscue flow), is, by definition,
a difference dropped in potential when a charge mass moves
between two satially seperated points. What we have termed
"electrical current" only flows where there is a suitable conducting
medium between things which have a diference in absolute
potential. Furthermore, between any two points in any material,
there is considerd to be a finite resistance  if we apply a
voltage
ahd have a mass current flowing between the two points!
Rigorously, to have one of the three is to hve them all. To lose
one is to lose all three. Immediately we see a major error in
present theory: Oe can have a "difference in scalar potential"
between
two points without having a "voltage drop" between them.
Specifically, if no mass current flows beteen them, no resistance
exists between them, and no voltage drop exists between them.
In the same fashion, one can have a "scalar wave" through the
vacuum without a voltage wave. In thatcase, the wave has no
Efield and no Hfield. The only reason one has an E field around
a staticallycharged object is because the charged electrons accum
ulated on the object are actually in violent motion. It is this
motion of the charged masses that prduces Efield  as well as
Hfield whenever that entire Efield ensemble moves through
laborotory sace.
Now let us reason together the "approximate" manner utilized in
present electromagnetic theory. For xample, let us examine a bird
sitting on a high tension line.
The bird sits on the high tension line without a flow of mass
electricity, because there is no signiicant difference in
potential drop between the bird and the line. Specifically,
between the birds tw feet  each in contact with a different
portion of
the line  there exists no potential difference. This is true
even though, with respect to the vacum, each foot is at a
potential that would be "100,000 volts higher," were a mass
current flowing. An it is true even though the absolute potential
of each foot may be some 200.1 million "volts," were a mass current
flowing.
Now an interesting thing happens to the bird when he flies
through the air to light upon the high tesion wire. As he flies
towards the wire, he is flying through the massless electrostatic
potential feld of the wire, for that field extends an infinite d
istance away from the wire. The electrostatic potential field 
pure 0field  is actually the spaiotemporal intensity of the
massless charge at a point. In other words, as the bird flies to
the wir, he flies into an increasing "massless charge" poten
tial, building up to 100,000 "volts" higher than the earth.
However, very little (if any) "mass flow potential difference is
experienced upon his body in approaching the wire, and so
essientially no "harged mass currents" are induced in his body.
Thus the little flier safely navigates into the teeth of a very high
electrostatic potential, lights upon he wire, and is not "fried"
in the process. When he lights on the wire, his body has reached
the eletrostatic potential that each foot's contact point ha
s. Again, there is no mass current flow. But his body is immersed
in an increased flux of massless carge  which is what the
electrostatic potential represents. And each "virtual particle"
flow in tht charge represents a "massless (scalar)" electrical
current.
The point is, one can have any amount of massless charge flow 
"scalar" current  without any mecanical work being done in the
system. All electrical work in a circuit is done against the
physical ass of the charged masses that flow. Rigorously, forc
e is defined as the time rate of charge of momentum. Even in the
relativistic case where F = ma + v(m/dt), change of momentum
requires mass movement. No mechanical work, and hence no energy,
is expendd by massless charge flow.
That is why the vacuum massless charge  which is composed of a
very high flux of massless "particls"  normally does no work on
our systems, and expends none of its very high "potential
energy." Itis exactly the same as the bird which flew into an in
creasing scalar field as it approached the high tension wire 
no work was done upon the bird by th increasing scalar flux
currents encountered by its body.
By existing "in the vacuum," so to speak, we (the whole earth)
are as birds sitting on a high tensio line! Until we create a
significant differece in potential, via our present
electromagnetic circuit, no current can flow  anywhere. Even
if we produce potential differences, we must have a conductor and charged
masses to flow, if we with to produce echanical work. Presently
our electromagnetic theory allows us to create a difference in
potential wthin different parts of a circuit, but only by moving
and shifting charged mass. We therefore have to do work on this
electrical mass in moving it around and we only get back the work
we have put into the circuit. In other words, presently all wee
do is"pump" electrical mass.
Now notice what would happen to the bird on the line if we
substantially "pulsed" the potential on te line. Suppose we
"pulsed" it such that the bird's physical system  considered as
a circuit contining a capicitance, a resistance, an inductance,
and
many free electrons  became resonant to the pulsing frequency.
In that case the "bird system" woud resonate, and a great deal of
electrical mass would surge back and forth in the body of the
bird. n the birds body, voltage would exist, charged mass c
urrent would flow, work would be done, and the bird would be
electrocuted.
Also, note that, without mass movement, electromagnetic vector
fields are not produced (and a portio of the difficulty lies with
the actual vector mechanics itself). Scalar (nonvector) waves
continualy penetrate the "space" where there is no mass moveme
nt. This means there can exist a "delta0" without a voltage or
an Efield. The present theory does ot allow this, because it
always uses "q" (charge) to be charged mass. Briefly, without
belaboring te point, let us just say that is the mechanical spin
of the individual charged particle  such as the electron 
which "entangles" or "knits together" r "couples" independent
scalar waves into vector waves. A vector wave is simply two
coupled scalar wves. The entire force field concept  such as
the Efield and the Bfield  is operationally Defined in terms of the
force exhibited on a test particle or test mass. Rigorusly, an
Efield does not exist as a force field in a vacuum, but as two
coupledscalar 0fields "tumbling about each other." When the
se two coupled, tumbling fields meet a spinning electron, e.g.,
the force emerges on the electron mas. In short, movement of a
rotating mass changes delta0 to "voltage", creating the V/I/R
triad.
By "accululating charged mass particles"  such as electrons 
one certainly can increase the valu of 0, which represents the
charge intensity or "scalar electrostatic potential." However,
that is nt the only way to increase it. Resonance and rotatio
n of charged mass can also be appropriately employed to vary the
vacuum charge potential 0, under prper circumstances.
By the correct application of rotary principles and Tesla
electromagnetic theory, it is possible to scillate  and change
the vacuum potential itself, in one part of an electrical system.

