About
Community
Bad Ideas
Drugs
Ego
Artistic Endeavors
But Can You Dance to It?
Cult of the Dead Cow
Literary Genius
Making Money
No Laughing Matter
On-Line 'Zines
Science Fiction
Self-Improvement
Erotica
Fringe
Society
Technology
register | bbs | search | rss | faq | about
meet up | add to del.icio.us | digg it

Macintosh 128k vs a Brick



The Macintosh 128K vs. A Brick
By Alex Reed

I have noticed that there has been a lot of talk recently about
the uses (or the lack thereof) of the Mac 128K. I have decided to put
forth a simple comparison: The Macintosh 128K versus a standard brick.
In posing such an important contrast, one must look at the criteria.
How fast is it? How portable is it? How attractive? Do you need a disk
with a system and finder to start it up? How much does it cost? Is it
user-friendly?
The first test I conducted was to find how fast it is. I attempted
to turn on the Mac, but the switch had fallen off; likewise with the
brick. As an alternative speed experiment, I set up a radar gun to see
which one I could throw faster. Because of its relatively small size, I
was able to throw the brick was faster by almost ten miles per hour. To
back up my findings, I simulated a wind tunnel on both. Once again the
brick's aerodynamic shape and low center of gravity triumphed over the
Macintosh's oafish one.
For my next comparison, I tested each object's portability. I
observed this in two ways. First, on Monday I carried a brick around
with me all day. I found that at times it did become inconvenient, but
that was nothing compared to Tuesday. On Tuesday, I got some really
bizarre looks from various people, because it's not every day that one
sees another lugging around a computer from the Dark Ages. No one would
sit with me during lunch, and my arms became so tired from carrying it
that by the end of the day I could barely write. My second test was a
simple poll. I journeyed down to the nearest airport, and as people
were getting off their planes, I showed them the Mac and the brick. At
this point, I asked them which they would rather carry around in their
suitcase. The results were unanimously in favor of the brick.
The third criterion of my testing was based on apparent
attractiveness.
When it first was released to the public in 1984, the 128K was offered
in a repulsive brownish-tan; and after being around for eight and a
half years, it was a little dirty. Once again, I attempted a survey. My
study was conducted at the Northeastern School of Bricklaying. The
results were in support of the brick. Eighty-six percent preferred it,
eleven percent liked the Macintosh, and three percent were undecided.
The Macintosh 128K requires a startup disk with no more than
System 2.2. If you are (un)lucky enough to find a copy of System 2.2,
try fitting that and a finder and whatever software you intend to use
on a 400K disk. Not so easy, huh? To use a brick, there is really no
reason to have a startup disk, unless it's got System 2.2 on it, in
which case you could use the brick to smash that disk. So if you don't
have a startup disk with a pitiful system, (and hopefully you don't),
the brick is the logical choice for you.
Also: as a side note, the Macintosh 128K comes with a black and
white monochrome monitor, and no plug to attach a color monitor to.
However, the brick is colorful in itself. Most bricks are available in
a very attractive red -- not too dull, not too bright. So if you're
looking for color, the brick is a step up from the 128K.
For my next test, I made a simple tour of shops in the general
vicinity, and asked around about the prices of bricks. The general
consensus was in the range of a few cents per brick. Unfortunately, I
couldn't find a place that sold 128K's. I asked a dealer how much a
used one would run for, and she replied, "Ballpark figure would be
about thirty, thirty-five." So I conclude that the brick is the logical
choice for one without a thick wallet.
Which of the two is easier to use? I sat down at the brick one
day, and after contemplating it for a while, I concluded that there
really isn't anything that hard to figure out about it. The most
mechanically declined people could use it. I then moved my chair over
to the next desk, upon which sat the Macintosh. With a pair of
needle-nosed pliers, I turned it on, and that annoying face on the
screen frowned at me. At this point, I remembered that one must have a
startup disk to get the 128K going. After searching through all my
disks, I finally found one that had System 7 and a finder. "This
computer does not have enough memory to run System 7." So I actually
couldn't even get to the desktop, which classifies it as being about as
non-user-friendly as possible.
After comparing the two rivals, I have decided that if you're
looking for the more attractive, user-friendly, and less expensive
device for yourself or anyone else, the obvious choice is a brick.


 
To the best of our knowledge, the text on this page may be freely reproduced and distributed.
If you have any questions about this, please check out our Copyright Policy.

 

totse.com certificate signatures
 
 
About | Advertise | Bad Ideas | Community | Contact Us | Copyright Policy | Drugs | Ego | Erotica
FAQ | Fringe | Link to totse.com | Search | Society | Submissions | Technology
Hot Topics
Best N64 Games
Why no love for Forza Motorsport?
Which free MMORPG do you recomend?
Will PS3 Survive?
War, war never changes
Games to play on a laptop on roadtrip
PS3 HDMI Question
Life Size Warthog
 
Sponsored Links
 
Ads presented by the
AdBrite Ad Network

 

TSHIRT HELL T-SHIRTS