About
Community
Bad Ideas
Guns & Weapons
Irresponsible Activities
KA-FUCKING-BOOM!
Locks and Security
Scams and Rip-offs
Drugs
Ego
Erotica
Fringe
Society
Technology
register | bbs | search | rss | faq | about
meet up | add to del.icio.us | digg it

More Free Electricity


NOTICE: TO ALL CONCERNED Certain text files and messages contained on this site deal with activities and devices which would be in violation of various Federal, State, and local laws if actually carried out or constructed. The webmasters of this site do not advocate the breaking of any law. Our text files and message bases are for informational purposes only. We recommend that you contact your local law enforcement officials before undertaking any project based upon any information obtained from this or any other web site. We do not guarantee that any of the information contained on this system is correct, workable, or factual. We are not responsible for, nor do we assume any liability for, damages resulting from the use of any information on this site.


[Ctrl-S Stop/Start] [Spacebar to Exit]

#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@
$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#%$&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#
%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$
&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%
@#$%& @#$%&
#$%&@ The New Tesla Electromagnetics and #$%&@
$%&@# The Secrets of Free Electrical Energy $%&@#
%&@#$ %&@#$
&@#$% (Part 1) by T. E. Bearden &@#$%
@#$%& @#$%&
#$%&@ Retyped Without Permission, 7/13/86, by (_>Shadow Hawk 1<_) #$%&@
$%&@# $%&@#
%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$
&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%
@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&
#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@#$%&@



Comments on the New Tesla Electromagnetics
------------------------------------------
A:Discrepancies in Present EM Theory

There are at least twenty-two major discrepancies presently existing in conventional electromagnettheory. This paper presends a summary of those flaws, and is a further commentary on my discussio fsalar longitudinal waves in a previous paper, "S
olutions to Tesla's Secrets and the Soviet Tesla Weapons," Tesla Book Company, 1981 and 1982.

I particularly wish to express my deep appreciation to two of my friends and colleagues who at thime, I believe, wish to remain anonymous. One of the two is an experimental genius who can produc tm that do not work by orthodox theory. The secon
d is a master of materials science and electromagnetics theory. I thank them both for their exceptiocontributions and stimuli regarding potential shortcoming in present electromagnetics theory, andterforbearance with the many discussions we have h
eld on this and related subjects.

It goes without saying that any etrors in this paper are strictly my own, and not the fault of eitof my distinguished colleagues.

(1) In present electromagnetics theory, charge and charged mass are falsely made identical. Actualon a charged particle, the "charge" is the flux of virtual particles on the "bare particle" of obevbe mass. The charged particle is thus a "system"
of true massless charge coupled to a bare chargeless mass. The observable "mass" is static, three-dsional and totally spatial. "Charge" is dynamic, four-dimensional or more, virtual and spatiotemprl urther, the charge and observable mass can be d
e-coupled, contrary to present theory. Decoupled charge -- that is, the absence of mass -- is simplyt we presently refer to as "Vacuum." Vacuum, spacetime, and massless charge are all identical. Rioosy, we should utilize any of these three as an "
ether," as suggested for vacuum by Einstein himself (see Max Born, Einstiein's Theory of Relativity,ised Edition, Dover Publications, New York, 1965, p. 224). And all three of them are identically nnry -- not energy, but more fundamental component
s of energy.

(2) Electrostatic potential is regarded as a purely 3-dimensional spatial stress. Instead, it is tntensity of a many-dimensional (at least four-dimensional) virtual flux and a stress on all four iesons of spacetime. This is easily seen, once on
e recognizes that spacetime is identically masless charged. (It is not "filled" with charge; rather,is charge!) Just as, in a gas under pressure, the accumulation of additional gas further stressestegs, the accumulation of charge (spacetime) stres
ses charge (spacetime). Further, if freed from its attachment to mass, charge can flow exclusively ime, exclusively in space, or in any combination of the two. Tesla waves -- which are scalar wavesi ue massless charge flux itself -- thus can exhib
it extraordinary characteristics that ordinary vector waves do not possess. And Tesla waves have extimensional degrees of freedom in which to move, as compared to vector waves. Indeed, one way to vsaie a tesla scalar wave is to regard it as a pure
oscillation of time itself.

(3) Voltage and potential are often confused in the electrostatic case, or at least thought of as posed of the same thing." For that reason, voltage is regarded as "potential drop." This also is o re. Rigorously, the potential is the intensity o
f the virtual particle flux at a single point -- whether or not there is any mass at the point -- anth the pressure and the point itself are spatiotemporal (4-dimensional) and not spatial (3-dimensoa)as presently assumed. Voltage represents th
e spatial intersection of the difference in potential between two seperated spatial points, always implies at least a miniscule flow of mass current (that is what makes it spatial!). "Voltag"i patial and depends upon the presence of observa
ble mass flow, while scalar electrostatic potential is spatiotemporal and depends upon the absence oservable mass flow. The two are not even of the same dimensionality.

(4) The charge of vacuum spacetime is assumed to be zero, when in fact it is a very high value. Va has no mass, but it has great massless charge and virtual particle charge flux. For proof that acagd vacuum is the seat of something in motion, se
e G. M. Graham and D. G. Lahoz, "Observation of static electromagnetic angular momentum in vacuo," Ne, Vol. 285, 15 May 1980, pp. 154-155. In fact, vacuum IS charge, identically, and it is also spaeie and at least four-dimensional.

(5) Contrary to its present usage, zero is dimensional and relative in its context. A three-dimensl spatial hole, for example, exists in time. If we model time as a dimension, then the spatial hoehsone dimension in 4-space. So a spatial absence
is a spatiotemporal presence. In the vacuum 4-space, a spatial nothing is still a something. The "vil" concept and mathematical concept of a derivative are simply two present ways of unconsciously drsing this fundamental problem of the dimensional
relativity of zero.

(6) The concepts of "space" and "time" imply that spacetime (vacuum) has been seperated into two p. We can only think of a space as "continuing to exist in time." To separate vacuum spacetime noto pieces, an operation is continually requir
ed. The operator that accomplishes this splitting operation is the photon interaction, the interactif vector electromagnetic energy or waves with mass. I have already strongly pointed out this effetadpresented a "raindrop model" or first-order phy
sical change itself in my book, The Excalibur Briefing, Strawberry Hill Press, San Francisco, 1980, 128-130.

(7) "Vector magnetic potential" is assumed to be always an aspect of (and connected to) the magnetield. In fact it is a separate, fundamental field of nature and it can be entirely disconnected fo h magnetic field. See Richard P. Feynman et al,
The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., New York, 1964, Vol. II, pp. 15-8 to14. Curiously, this fact has been proven for years, yet it has been almost completely ignored in h et. The "(triangle)x" operator, when applied to
the A-field, makes B-field. If the (triangle)x operator is not applied, the "freed" A-field possessech-expanded characteristics from those presently allowed in the "bound" theory. Specifically, it eoe a scalar or "shadow vector" field; it is not a
normal vector field.

(8) The speed of light in vacuum is assumed to be a fundamental constant of nature. Instead it is nction of the intensity of the massless charge flux (that is, of the magnitude of the electrostatcptntial) of the vacuum in which it moves. (Indeed
, since vacuum and masless charge are one and the same, one may say that the speed of light is a funn of the intensity of the spatiotemporal vacuum!). The higher the flux intensity (charge) of the aum the faster the speed of light in it. This is a
n observed fact and already shown by hardcore measurements. For example, distinct differences actualxist in the speed of light in vacuo, when measured on the surface of the earth as compared to mesrmnts in space away from planetary masses. In a v
acuum on the surface of the earth, light moves significantly faster. For a discussion and the statis, see B. N. Belyaev, "On Random Fluctuations of the Velocity of Light in Vacuum," Soviet Physics ora, No. 11, Nov. 1980, pp. 37-42 (original in Ru
ssian, translation by Plenum Publishing Corporation.) The Russians have used this knowledge for over decades in their strategic psychotronics (energetics) program; yet hardly a single U.S. scientis saare of the measured variation of c in vacuo. In
fact, most Western scientists simply cannot believe it when it is pointed out to them!

(9) Energy is considered fundamental and equivalent to work. In fact, energy arises from vector prses, and it can be disassembled into more fundamental (anenergy) scalar components, since the vecoscn. These scalar components individually can be
moved to a distant location without expending work, since one is not moving force vectors. There thelar components can be joined and reassembled into vectors to provide "free energy" appearing at adsace, with no loss in between the initial and dis
tant points. For proof that a vector field can be replaced by (and considered to be composed of) twolar fields, see E. T. Whittaker, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, Volume 1, 1903, .37 By extension, any vector wave can be replaced
by two coupled scalar waves.

(10) The classical Poynting vector predicts no longitudinal wave of energy from a time-varying, elically charged source. In fact, an exact solution of the problem does allow this longitudinal wav.SeT. D. Keech and J. F. Corum, "A New Derivation
for the Field of a Time-Varying Charge in Einsteins Theory," International Journal of Theoretical Phs, Vol. 20, No. 1, 1981, pp. 63-68 for the proof.

(11) The present concepts of vector and scalar are severely limited, and do not permit the explicinsideration of the internal, finer-grained structures of a vector or a scalar. That is, a funaetl problem exists with the basic assumptions i
n the vector mathematics itself. The "space" of a vector field, for example, does not have inter-nessublevels (subspaces) containing finer "shadow vectors" or "virtual vectors." Yet particle physic a lready discovered that electrical reality is bu
ilt that way. Thus one should actually use a "hypernumber" theory after the manner of Charles Muses.calar is filled with (and composed of) nested levels of other "spaces" containing vectors, where hs um to "zero" in the ordinary observable frame w
ithout an observable vector resultant. In Muses' mathematics, for example, zero has real roots. Realsical devices can be -- and have been -- constructed in accordance with Muses' theory. For an intouton to Muses' profound hypernumberss approach, s
ee Charles Muses' forward to Jerome Rothstein, Communication, Ogranization and Science, The Falcon'sg Press, Indian Hills, Colorado, 1958. See also Charles Muses', "Applied Hypernumbers: Computatioa ovepts," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Vo
l. 3, 1976. See also Charles Muses' "Hypernumbers II", Aoplied Mathematics and Computation, Janurary8.

(12) With the expanded Tesla electromagnetics, a new conservation of energy law is required. Let ucapitulate for a moment. The oldest law called for the conservation of mass. The present law call o he conservation of "mass and energy", but not e
ach separately. If mass is regarded as simply another aspect of energy, then the present law calls fhe conservation of energy. However, this assumes that energy is a basic, fundamental concept. Sineteenergy concept is tied to work and the movement
of vector forces, it implicitly assumes "vector movement2 to be a "most fundamental" and irreduciblncept. But as we pointed out, Whittaker showed that vectors can always be further broken down int oefundamental coupled scalar components. Further,
Tesla discovered that these "coupled components" of "energy" can be individually separated, transmi, processed, rejoined, etc. This directly implies that energy per se need not be conserved. The nwlwtherefore calls for the conservation of anenerg
y, the components of energy. These components may be coupled into energy, and the energy may be furtcompacted into mass. It is the sum total of the (anenergy) components -- coupled and uncoupled --ta s conserved, not the matter or the energy per s
e. Further, this conservation of anenergy is not spatial; rather it is spatiotemporal in a spacetimeat least four or more dimensions.

(13) Relativity is presently regarded as a theory or statement about fundamental physical reality.fact, it is only a statement about FIRST ORDER reality -- the reality that emerges from th vcor interaction of electromagnetic energy with
matter. When we break down the vectors into scalars (shadow vectors or hypervectors), we immediatlyer a vastly different, far more fundamental reality. In this reality superluminal velocity, multil nverses, travel back and forth in time, higher d
imensions, variation of all "fundamental constants" of nature, materialization and dematerializationd violation of the "conservation of energy" are all involved. Even our present Aristotlean logic -fted to the photon interaction by vector light as
the fundamental observation mechanism -- is incapable of describing or modeling this more fundamenteality. Using scalar waves and scalar interactions as much subtler, far less limited observation/eeton mechanisms, we must have a new "superrelativ
ity" to describe the expanded electromagnetic reality uncovered by Nikola Tesla.

(14) "Charge" is assumed to be quantized, in addition to always occuring with -- and locked to --s. Indeed, charge is not necessarily quantized, just as it is not necessarily locked to mass. Ehrnatdiscovered and reported fractional charges for
years, in the 30's and 40's, and was ignored. See P.A.M. Dirac, "Development of the Physicist's Concon of Nature", Sumposium on the Development of the Physicist's Conception of Nature, ed. Jagdish eh,D. Reidel, Boston, 1973, pp. 12-14 for a presen
tation of some of Ehrenhaft's results. Within the last few years Stanford University researchers havso positively demonstrated the existence of "fractional charge." For a layman's description of thi ok, see "A Spector Haunting Physics," Science Ne
ws, Vol. 119, January 31, 1981, pp. 68-69. Indeed, Dirac in his referenced article points out that Mkan himself -- in his original oildrop experiments -- reported one measurement of fractional chare u discounted it as probably due to error.

(15) Presently, things are always regarded as traveling through normal space. Thus we use or modely the most elementary type of motion -- that performed by vector electromagnetic energy. We do no lo for things to "travel inside the vector flow i
tself." Yet, actually, there is a second, more subtle flow inside the first, and a third, even more le flow inside the second, and so on. We may operate inside, onto, into, and out of energy itself- n any anenergy component of energy. There are hy
pervectors and hyperscalars unlimited , within the ordinary vectors and scalars we already know. Fur, these "interlan flows" can be engineered and utilized, allowing physical reality itself to be drcl engineered, almost without limits.

(16) We always assume everything exists in time. Actually, nothing presently measured exists in tibecause the physicical detection/measurement process of our present instruments destroys time, ripn t off and tossing it away -- and thereby "colla
psing the wave function." Present scientific methodology thus is seriously flawed. It does not yielddamental (spacetime) truth, but only a partial (spatial) truth. This in turn leads to great scienii versights. For example. mass does not exist in
time, but mass x time (masstime) does. A fundamental constant does not exist in time, but "constant me" does. Energy does not exist in time, but energy x time (action) does. Even space itself does o xst in time -- spacetime does. We are almost alw
ays one dimension short in every observable we model. Yet we persist in thinking spatially, and we hdeveloped instruments that detect and measure spatially only. Such instruments can never measure n eect the phenomenology of the nested substrata o
f time. By using scalar technology, however, less limited instruments can indeed be constructed -- ahey have been. With such new instruments, the phenomenology of the new electromagnetics can be exlrdand an engineering technology developed.

(17) We do not recognize the connection between nested levels of virtual state (particle physics) orthogonally rotated frames (hyperspaces). Actually, the two are identical, as I showed in the apedxto my book, The Excalibur Briefing, Strawberry
Hills Press, San Francisco, 1980, pp. 233-235. A virtual particle in the laborotory frame is an obsele particle in a hyperspatial frame rotated more than one orthogonal turn away. This of course imle hat the hyperspatial velocity of all virtual pa
rticles is greater than the speed of light. The particle physicist is already deeply involved in hypaces and hyperspatial charge fluxes without realizing it. In other words , he is using tachyons (atces that move faster than light) without realizi
ng it.

(18) Presently quantum mechanics rigorously states that time is not an observable, and therefore innot be measured or detected. According to this assumption, one must always infer time from spatilmaurements, because all detections and measuremen
ts are spatial. With this assumption, our scientists prejudice themselves against looking for finer,quantal measurement methodologies and instrumentation. Actually this present limitation is the reuto the type of electromagnetics we presently know
, where all instruments (the "measurers") have been interacted with by vector electromagnetic energyght). Every mass that has temperature (and all masses do!) is continually absorbing and emitting htn, and in the process they are continually conne
cting to time and disconnecting from time. If time is continually being carried away from the detecttself by its emitted photons, then the detector cannot hold and "detect" that which it has ut lost. With Tesla electromagnetics, however,
the fundamental limitation of our present instru- ments need not apply. With finer instruments, we chow there are an infinite number of levels to "time", and it is only the "quantum level time" whihi ontinually being lost by vector light (photon)
interaction. By using subquantal scalar waves, instruments can move to deeper levels of time -- in w case the upper levels of time ARE measureable and detectable, in contradistinction to present asupins.

(19) In the present physics, time is modeled as, and considered to be, a continuous dimension suchlength. This is only a gross approximation. Indeed , time is not like a continuous "dimension," btmr like a series of "stiches," each of which is i
ndividually made and then ripped out before the next stitch appears. "Vector light" photons interact at a time, and it is this interaction with mass that creates quantum change itself. The absorbtino photon -- which is energy x time -- by a spati
al mass converts it to masstime: the time was added by the photon. The emission of a photon tears awhe time, leaving behind again a spatial mass. It is not accidental, then, that time flows at the pe f light, for it is light which contains and car
ries time. It is also not accidental that the photon IS the individual quantum. Since all our instrus presently are continually absorbing and emitting photons, they are all "quantized," and they acodnly "quantize" their detections. This is true be
cause all detection is totally internal to the detector, and the instruments only detect only their internal changes. Since these detections are on a totally granular quantized background, the detetosthemselves are quantized. The Minkowski model i
s fundamentally erroneous in its modeling of time, and for that reason relativity and quantum mechancontinue to resist all attempts to successfully combine them, quantum field theory notwithstandin.
(20) Presently, gravitational field and electrical field are considered mutually exclusive. Actualhis is also untrue. In 1974, for example, Santilli proved that electrical field and gravitationalfedindeed are not mutually exclusive. In that case
one is left with two possibilities: (a) they are totally the same thing, or (b) they are partially same thing. For the proof, see R. M. Santilli, "Partons and Gravitation: Some Puzzling Questions, nas of Physics, Vol. 83, No. 1, March 1974. With
the new Tesla electromagnetics, pure scalar waves in time itself can be produced electrically , and trostatics (when the charge has been seperated from the mass) becomes a "magic" tool capable of drcl affecting anything that exists in time -- incl
uding the gravitational field. Antigravity and the intertial drive are immediate and direct consequs of the new electromagnetics.

(21) Presently, mind is considered metaphysical, not a part of physics, and not affected by physiceans. Literally, the prevailing belief of Western scientists is that man is a mechanical robot --ee hough relativity depends entirely upon the idea
of the idea of the "observer." Western science today thus has essentially become dogmatic, and in trespect borders on a religion. Since this "religion," so to speak, is now fairly well entrenched nispower in the state, Western science is turning
itself into an oligarchy. But mind occupies time, and when we measure and affect time, we can directeasure and affect mind itself. In the new electromagnetics, then, Man regains his dignity and hishmnty by restoring the reality of mind and thought
to science. In my book, The Excalibur Briefing, I have already pointed out the reality of mind and mplified way in which it can be modeled to the first order. With scalar wave instruments, the reaiyo mind and thought can be measured in the labora
tory, and parapsychology becomes a working, engineering, scientific discipline.

(22) Multiple valued basic dimensional functions are either not permitted or severely discouraged he present theory. For one thing, integrals of multiple valued derivative functions have the annoighbit of "blowing up" and yielding erroneous answ
ers, or none at all. And we certainly do not allow multiple types of time! This leads to the absurdif the present interpretation of relativity, which permits only a single observer (and a single obevton) at a time. So if one believes as "absurd" a
thing as the fact that more than one person can observe an apple at the same time, the present physfails. However, the acceptance of such a simple proposition as multiple simultaneous observationlasto a physics so bizarre and incredible that mos
t Western physicists have been unable to tolerate it, much less examine its consequences. In the phy that emerges from multiple simultaneous observation, all possibilities are real and physical. Thr r an infinite number of worlds, orthogonal to on
e another, and each world is continually splitting into additional such "worlds" at a stupendous ratonetheless, this physics was worked out by Everett for his doctoral thesis in 1956, and the thesswspublished in 1957. (See Hugh Everett, III, The
Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics: A Fundamental Exposition, with papers by J. A. Whee B. S. DeWitt, L. N. Cooper and D. Van Vechten, and N. Graham; eds. Bryce S. Dewitt and Neill Graa,Pinceton Series in Physics, Princeton University
Press, 1973.) Even though it is bizarre, Everett's physics is entirely consistent with the present rimental basis of physics. The present electromagnetic theory is constructed for only a single "rd"o universe -- or "level." The expanded theory, o
n the other hand, contains multiply nested levels of virtual state charge -- and these levels are idcally the same as orthogonal universes, or "hyperframes." Multiple kinds -- and values -- of timeas xist. The new concept differs from Everett's, h
owever, in that the orthogonal universes intercommunicate in the virtual state. That is, an observabn one universe is always a virtual quantity in each of the other universes. Thus one can have mulilvl "continuities" and "discontinuities" simultan
eously, without logical conflict. It is precisely these levels of charge -- these levels of scalar vm -- that lace together the discontinuous quanta generated by the interaction of vector light wit as

However, to understand the new electromagnetic reality, one requires a new, expanded logic which cins the old Aristotlean logic as a subset. I have already pointed out the new logic in my paper, ACnitional Criterion for Identity, Leading to a Fo
urth Law of Logic," 1979, available from the National Technical Information Center, AD-A071032.

Even as logic is extended, quantum mechanics, quantum electrodynamics, and relativity are drasticachanged by the Tesla electromagnetics, as I point- ed out in my paper, "Solutions to Tesla's Secrt n the Soviet Tesla Weapons," Tesla Book Company,
1580 Magnolia, Millbrae, CA, 94030, 1980.

The present electromagnetics is just a special case of a much more fundamental electromtics discovered by Nikola Tesla, just as Newtonian physics is a special case of the relativistic hsc. But in the new electromagnetics case, the dif
ferences between the old and the new are far more drastic and profound.

Additional References ---------- ----------

1. Boren, Dr. Lawence Milton, "Discovery of the Fundamental Magnetic Charge (Arising from the new Covation of Magnetic Energy)," 1981/1982 (private communication). Dr. Boren has a cogent argument ta h positron is the fundamental unit of magnetic c
harge. His theory thus assigns fundamentally different natures to positive charge and negative chargn support of Dr. Boren, one should point out that the "positive" end of circuits can simply be "ls eative" than the "negative" end. In other words,
the circuit works simply from higher accumulation of negative charges (the "negative" end) to a lesaccumulation of negative charges (the "positive" end). Nowhere needthere be positive charges (proos ositrons, etc.) to make the circuit work. Dr. B
orens theory, though dramatic at first encounter, nonetheless bears close and meticulous examination particularly since he has been able to gather experimental data which support his theory and disge ith present theory.

2. Eagle, Albert, "An Alternative Explanation of Relativity Phenomena," philosophical Magazine and Jal of Science, No. 191, December 1939, pp. 694 -701.

3. Ehrenaft, Felix and Wasser, Emanuel, "Determination of the Size and Weight of Single Submicroscoppheres of the Order of Magnitude r = 4 x 10(-5) cm. to 5 x 10(-6) cm., as well as the Production fRa Images of Submicroscopic Particles by means of
Ultraviolet Light," Phil. Mag. and Jour. of Sci., Vol. II (Seventh Series), No. 7, July 1926, pp. 3.

4. Ehrenhaft, Felix and Wasser, Emanuel, "New Evidence of the Existance of Charges smaller than the tron - (a) The Micromagnet; (b) The Law of Resistance; © The computation of errors of the Metho, hl. Mag. and Jour. of Sci., Vol. V (Seventh Seri
es), No. 28, February 1928, pp. 225-241.

5. See also Ehrenhaft's last paper dealing with the electronic charge, in Philosophy of Science, Vo, 1941, p. 403.

6. McGregor, Donald Rait, The Inertia of the Vacuum: A New Foundation for Theoretical Physics, Exposn Press, Smithtown, NY, First Edition, 1981, pp. 15-20.

7. Ignat'ev, Yu. G. and Balakin, A. B., "Nonliner Gravitational Waves in Plasma," Soviet Physics Jou, Vol. 24, No. 7, July 1981, (U.S. Translation, Consultants Bureau, NY, JAnurary 1982), pp. 593-57

8. Yater, Joseph C., "Relation of the second law of thermodynamics to the power conversion of energyctuations," Phys. Review A, Vol. 20, no. 4, October 1979, pp. 1614-1618.

9. DeSantis, Romano M. et al, "On the Analysis of Feedback Systems With a Multipower Open Loop Chainctober 1973, available through the Defense Technical Information Center (AD 773188).

10. Graneau, Peter, "Electromagnetic Jet-Propulsion in the Direction of current flow," Nature, Vol. 28 Janurary 1982, pp. 311-312

11. "Gravity and acceleration aren't always equivalent," New Scientist, 17 September 1981, p. 723.

12. Gonyaev, V. V., "Experimental Determination of the Free-Fall Acceleration of a Relativistic CharParticle. II. A Cylindrical Solenoid in a Time- Independent Field of Inertial Forces," Izvestiya U,Fzika, No. 7, 1979, pp. 28-32. English Translati
on: Soviet Physics Journal, No. 7, 1979, pp. 829-833. If one understands the new, expanded electromaics, this Soviet paper indicates a means of generating antigravity and pure inertial fields.

13. R. Schaffranke, "The Development of Post-Relativistic Concepts in Physics and Advanced Technologroad," Energy Unlimited, No. 12, Winter 1981, pp. 15-20.

14. F. K. Preikschat, A Critical look at the theory of Relativity, Library of Congress Catalogue No.670044. Extensive compilation of measurements of the speed of light. Clearly shows the speed of lgti not constant but changes, sometimes even daily
.

B: The Secret of Electrical Free Energy

Present electromagnetic theory is only a special case of the much more funda- mental electromagneticory discovered by Nikola Tesla at the turn of the century.

Pure vacuum is pure charge flux, without mass. The vacuum has a very high electrical potential -- soing on the order of 200 million volts, with respect to a hypothetical zero charge.

Thus in an ordinary electrical circuit, each point of the "ground" -- which has the same potential ae vacuum -- actually has a non-zero absolute potential. This circuit ground has a value of zero ol ih respect to something else which has the same
absolute electrical potential.

Voltage, which is always associated with a flow of electrical "mass" current (even if only a minisculow), is, by definition, a difference dropped in potential when a charge mass moves between two saily seperated points. What we have termed "electr
ical current" only flows where there is a suitable conducting medium between things which have a difnce in absolute potential. Furthermore, between any two points in any material, there is considerdt e a finite resistance -- if we apply a voltage
ahd have a mass current flowing between the two points! Rigorously, to have one of the three is to hthem all. To lose one is to lose all three. Immediately we see a major error in present theory: Oecnhave a "difference in scalar potential" between
two points without having a "voltage drop" between them. Specifically, if no mass current flows bet them, no resistance exists between them, and no voltage drop exists between them.

In the same fashion, one can have a "scalar wave" through the vacuum without a voltage wave. In thate, the wave has no E-field and no H-field. The only reason one has an E field around a staticallycagd object is because the charged electrons accum
ulated on the object are actually in violent motion. It is this motion of the charged masses that pres E-field -- as well as H-field whenever that entire E-field ensemble moves through laborotory sae

Now let us reason together the "approximate" manner utilized in present electromagnetic theory. For ple, let us examine a bird sitting on a high tension line.

The bird sits on the high tension line without a flow of mass electricity, because there is no signint difference in potential drop between the bird and the line. Specifically, between the birds tw et-- each in contact with a different portion of
the line -- there exists no potential difference. This is true even though, with respect to the vacueach foot is at a potential that would be "100,000 volts higher," were a mass current flowing. An ti true even though the absolute potential of eac
h foot may be some 200.1 million "volts," were a mass current flowing.

Now an interesting thing happens to the bird when he flies through the air to light upon the high ten wire. As he flies towards the wire, he is flying through the massless electrostatic potential fedo the wire, for that field extends an infinite d
istance away from the wire. The electrostatic potential field -- pure 0-field -- is actually the spaemporal intensity of the massless charge at a point. In other words, as the bird flies to the wir,h lies into an increasing "massless charge" poten
tial, building up to 100,000 "volts" higher than the earth. However, very little (if any) "mass flowtential difference is experienced upon his body in approaching the wire, and so essientially no "hre mass currents" are induced in his body. Thus t
he little flier safely navigates into the teeth of a very high electrostatic potential, lights upon wire, and is not "fried" in the process. When he lights on the wire, his body has reached the eletottic potential that each foot's contact point ha
s. Again, there is no mass current flow. But his body is immersed in an increased flux of massless ce -- which is what the electrostatic potential represents. And each "virtual particle" flow in thtcage represents a "massless (scalar)" electrical
current.

The point is, one can have any amount of massless charge flow -- "scalar" current -- without any meccal work being done in the system. All electrical work in a circuit is done against the physical aso the charged masses that flow. Rigorously, forc
e is defined as the time rate of charge of momentum. Even in the relativistic case where F = ma + v(t), change of momentum requires mass movement. No mechanical work, and hence no energy, is expenddb assless charge flow.

That is why the vacuum massless charge -- which is composed of a very high flux of massless "particl-- normally does no work on our systems, and expends none of its very high "potential energy." Iti xctly the same as the bird which flew into an in
creasing scalar field as it approached the high tension wire -- no work was done upon the bird by thcreasing scalar flux currents encountered by its body.

By existing "in the vacuum," so to speak, we (the whole earth) are as birds sitting on a high tensione! Until we create a significant differece in potential, via our present electromagnetic circuit,n urrent can flow -- anywhere. Even if we produc
e potential differences, we must have a conductor and charged masses to flow, if we with to produce anical work. Presently our electromagnetic theory allows us to create a difference in potential wti ifferent parts of a circuit, but only by moving
and shifting charged mass. We therefore have to do work on this electrical mass in moving it aroundd we only get back the work we have put into the circuit. In other words, presently all wee do is"up electrical mass.

Now notice what would happen to the bird on the line if we substantially "pulsed" the potential on tine. Suppose we "pulsed" it such that the bird's physical system -- considered as a circuit contiiga capicitance, a resistance, an inductance, and
many free electrons -- became resonant to the pulsing frequency. In that case the "bird system" wouesonate, and a great deal of electrical mass would surge back and forth in the body of the bird. ntebirds body, voltage would exist, charged mass c
urrent would flow, work would be done, and the bird would be electrocuted.

Also, note that, without mass movement, electromagnetic vector fields are not produced (and a portio the difficulty lies with the actual vector mechanics itself). Scalar (nonvector) waves continualypntrate the "space" where there is no mass moveme
nt. This means there can exist a "delta-0" without a voltage or an E-field. The present theory does allow this, because it always uses "q" (charge) to be charged mass. Briefly, without belaboring tepit, let us just say that is the mechanical spin
of the individual charged particle -- such as the electron -- which "entangles" or "knits together" couples" independent scalar waves into vector waves. A vector wave is simply two coupled scalar wvs he entire force field concept -- such as the E-
field and the B-field -- is operationally Defined in terms of the force exhibited on a test particle test mass. Rigorusly, an E-field does not exist as a force field in a vacuum, but as two coupledsaa 0-fields "tumbling about each other." When the
se two coupled, tumbling fields meet a spinning electron, e.g., the force emerges on the electron maIn short, movement of a rotating mass changes delta-0 to "voltage", creating the V/I/R triad.

By "accululating charged mass particles" -- such as electrons -- one certainly can increase the valu 0, which represents the charge intensity or "scalar electrostatic potential." However, that is ntteonly way to increase it. Resonance and rotatio
n of charged mass can also be appropriately employed to vary the vacuum charge potential 0, under pr circumstances.

By the correct application of rotary principles and Tesla electromagnetic theory, it is possible to llate -- and change the vacuum potential itself, in one part of an electrical system. Thus by coretp
[Ripco] Which 1-281 ?=menu,<CR>=abort:{
 
To the best of our knowledge, the text on this page may be freely reproduced and distributed.
If you have any questions about this, please check out our Copyright Policy.

 

totse.com certificate signatures
 
 
About | Advertise | Bad Ideas | Community | Contact Us | Copyright Policy | Drugs | Ego | Erotica
FAQ | Fringe | Link to totse.com | Search | Society | Submissions | Technology
Hot Topics
Free Logitech Products Wihtout Owning
Urban Exploration
graffiti on google earth.
joining the military.
Cutting the gas line
How do I get rid of my roommate?
The Xbox 360 switch
How to Really Succeed at Bad Ideas
 
Sponsored Links
 
Ads presented by the
AdBrite Ad Network

 

TSHIRT HELL T-SHIRTS