|
HAARP: Are There Issues of Concern to Physicists?
by C.L. Herzenberg
NOTICE: TO ALL CONCERNED Certain text files and messages contained on this site deal with activities and devices which would be in violation of various Federal, State, and local laws if actually carried out or constructed. The webmasters of this site do not advocate the breaking of any law. Our text files and message bases are for informational purposes only. We recommend that you contact your local law enforcement officials before undertaking any project based upon any information obtained from this or any other web site. We do not guarantee that any of the information contained on this system is correct, workable, or factual. We are not responsible for, nor do we assume any liability for, damages resulting from the use of any information on this site.
High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program: Are There Issues to Concern Physicists?
In 1988, discussion first appeared in Physics and Society about a
recently patented concept dealing with modification of the Earth's
upper atmosphere using high-intensity radio frequency radiation
(1,2,3). Not only did this approach seem to have ramifications
relating to ionospheric physics, but also certain of the proposed
activities appeared to potentially threaten Earth's upper atmosphere
and to have arms control implications.
Briefly, the patented invention involves generating an extremely
intense beam of circularly-polarized radio-frequency
electromagnetic radiation of appropriate frequency and directing
this toward the upper atmosphere (1). At certain altitudes, electron
cyclotron resonance heating of existing electrons would be
expected to cause further ionization of the neutral particles in the
atmosphere, and a range of other consequences could ensue (1,2).
The patent presents claims that changes in Earth's atmosphere could
be created which would persist for prolonged periods of time, and
the language of the patent also indicated that it is intended to
produce effects on a global scale (1,2). It has been suggested that
these changes may pose a danger to the upper atmosphere, in that
irreversible damage to the upper atmosphere may ensue from tests
of the types described in the patent (1).
Among the proposed applications are the disruption of microwave
transmissions of satellites; the selective enhancement, modification,
or interception of communications; and causing total disruption of
communications over a large portion of Earth (1,2). Other proposed
applications include weather modification; changing the chemical
composition of the atmosphere; transporting plumes of particulates
or plasma within the atmosphere; lifting large regions of the
atmosphere; and intercepting or destroying incoming missiles or
aircraft (1,2). That this invention has features satisfying the
requirements of a weapons system is emphasized in the patent (2).
It was pointed out in subsequent correspondence in Physics and
Society that realization of this invention might lead to violations of
the Environmental Modification Convention (3). This Convention,
signed in 1977 and ratified by the United States in 1979, prohibits
military or any other hostile use of environmental modifical
techniques, and states that "Each State Party to this convention
undertakes not to engage in military or any other hostile use of
environmental modification techniques having widespread, long-
lasting, or severe effects as the means of destruction, damage or
injury to any other State Party." Both the Convention itself and the
accompanying Understandings Regarding the Convention make it
explicitly clear that the atmosphere, the ionosphere, and near-Earth
space are included in the Convention (4).
Currently, the patented invention (which is reportedly also covered
by classified patents (1)) has been developed and is being
implemented in military programs, most recently in the new High
Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) (5). In part
because of its potential to disrupt communications as a side effect
as well as deliberately, this project is received with apparent
apprehension by Alaskans, and with favor due to its economic
impact (6,7).
The High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program, which is
managed cooperatively by the Air Force and the Navy, is described
in information sheets as a project having the goal of studying
fundamental physical principles governing the ionosphere (5). The
proposed research would use high-power radio transmitters to
probe the overhead ionosphere, in conjunction with a complement
of diagnostic instrumentation. A unique feature of the facility
would be a high-power high-frequency radio transmitter with the
capability of rapidly steering a narrow beam into a designated
direction. HAARP would transmit HF radio waves within the 2.8 to
10 MHz band in a narrow beam, several degrees wide, depending
on frequency, thus influencing a region several miles in diameter in
the lower ionosphere (5). The power demands for the transmitters
are reportedly 12 megawatts (5). Much higher power levels of 109-
1011 watts are also considered in the original patent (1,2).
Potential applications for HAARP are described as including
developing DoD technology for detecting cruise missiles and
aircraft and for communicating with submarines (5). It is planned to
construct HAARP at auroral latitudes in Alaska. The US Air Force
has specifically settled on a site near the village of Gakona,
northeast of Anchorage, where construction was scheduled to begin
in 1993 and be concluded in late 1977 (5,7).
It would appear that, while construction of the HAARP facility may
provide new equipment for ionospheric studies as well as
applications, this technology does present issues that need to be
publicly addressed by the technical community. Related research,
and particularly the fact that that research has been non-
competitively funded, has already drawn the attention of physicists
(8). However, a detailed examination and explicit critique by
members of the physics community of the characteristics of this
particular technology might clarify the issues and contribute to
allaying concerns and resolving questions that have already arisen,
and to suggesting courses of action to address the issues raised by
this project.
C.L. Herzenberg
1. Richard Williams Physics and Society, Vol. 17, No. 2, p. 16 (April 1988).
2. Bernard Eastlund US Patent Number 4,686,605 (August 11, 1987).
3. C.L. Herzenberg Physics and Society, Vol. 17, No. 3, p. 2 (July 1988).
4. Arms Control and Disarmament Agreements: Texts and Histories of the
Negotiations, "Convention on the prohibition of military or other hostile use of environmental modification techniques," US Arms Control and Disarmament Agency, Washington, DC (1990).
5. HAARP Fact Sheet, Office of Naval Research (4 November 1993).
6. C.J. Zickuhr, Anchorage AK, private communication (November 1993).
7. Peter S. Goodman, "Gakona Gets Ionosphere Project," Anchorage Daily
News, Vol. 48, No. 319, p. B-1 (15 November 1993).
8. Robert L. Park, in What's New, American Physical Society, Washington DC (2 November 1990, 9 November 1990, 29 November 1991, 6 March 1992).
|
|